We already seem to have pretty good evidence this is a high turnout election. We knew it would be high by recent historical standards. The question was whether it might top 2020 or whether it would be between 2016 and 2020. My sense is that it might end up being higher than 2020, which was the highest turnout in over a century. As to whom that helps, that’s less clear. My gut tells me that’s good for Harris. But that’s no certainty. Remember that Trump’s strategy is relying on low propensity voters. By definition, the higher the turnout the higher the percentage of occasional (low-propensity) voters. So there’s definitely a very reasonable theory that it might help him. We don’t know. For now I think we can just say there are lots of signs of high turnout. So we could have another presidential election that is the highest in modern history. Who it helps I don’t think we can say yet.
LATEST
Morning Memo
SCOTUS, Congress, and the Trump Ballroom Fiasco
09.01.26 | 11:52 am
News
‘A Shit Show’: Postal Service Whistleblower Warns That New Project Will Sow Chaos in Election
09.01.26 | 10:51 am
Cafe
The Supreme Court’s Ballroom Decision Gave Trump the Only Thing He Cared About
09.01.26 | 8:43 am
The Brief
DHS ‘Voter Fraud Surge’ Reportedly Begins Today
09.01.26 | 8:11 am