We already seem to have pretty good evidence this is a high turnout election. We knew it would be high by recent historical standards. The question was whether it might top 2020 or whether it would be between 2016 and 2020. My sense is that it might end up being higher than 2020, which was the highest turnout in over a century. As to whom that helps, that’s less clear. My gut tells me that’s good for Harris. But that’s no certainty. Remember that Trump’s strategy is relying on low propensity voters. By definition, the higher the turnout the higher the percentage of occasional (low-propensity) voters. So there’s definitely a very reasonable theory that it might help him. We don’t know. For now I think we can just say there are lots of signs of high turnout. So we could have another presidential election that is the highest in modern history. Who it helps I don’t think we can say yet.
Latest

14 hours ago
Politically Connected Firms Benefit From Trump Tariff Exemptions Amid Secrecy, Confusion

1 day ago
FBI Stages Courthouse Arrest of Wisconsin Judge

2 days ago
The Untold Story Of How Ed Martin Ghostwrote Online Attacks Against a Judge—And Still Became A Top Trump Prosecutor

2 days ago
Judge Rejects Trump’s Vision Of An All-Powerful Presidency In Blocking Chunks Of His Election Order
Latest Editors' Blog
-
|April 26, 2025 6:12 p.m.
I said yesterday that I thought we likely weren’t far away from the first national poll which showed Donald Trump’s…
-
|April 24, 2025 9:35 p.m.
Government Executive: “The Veterans Affairs Department is requiring all employees working on its plans to slash tens of thousands of…
-
|April 24, 2025 9:22 p.m.
Question: I’m looking for examples of medical schools which may just have received a letter from the Justice Department demanding…
-
|April 24, 2025 8:42 p.m.
This isn’t terribly surprising, given the broader budgetary situation at American universities, particularly in the sciences and biomedical research specifically….