There’s a DS-9 Episode

Aside from the myriad other stories swirling this morning, we have a report that captures not just the sorry but ridiculous state in which the country now finds itself. According to the Post, the White House is considering a plan, which, depending on one’s generosity and willingness to squint, ranges from federalizing homeless policy in California to setting up internment camps for the homeless in the state.

What seems clear is that the officials working on the project don’t really know which it is themselves. That probably stems from two reasons: First, the people working on it don’t have any experience with homelessness issues — either from a social services or punitive viewpoint. The other is that the impetus for the plan is President Trump’s impulses, which in this case seem to be a generalized rage at homeless people and a desire to swoop in and show he can do better than the Democrats, who in his mind govern the urban “shitholes” where people don’t vote for him.

Officials who spoke to the Post claim internment isn’t on their agenda. “We’re not rounding people up or anything yet. You guys in the media get too ahead of yourselves.” But the denials tend to confirm rather than dispel that idea. The planning — which appears to focus on inspecting an unused FAA facility that could be used to house the state’s homeless population — suggests otherwise.

What gets secondary coverage in the Post article is that the federal government has no role in any of this. It’s not clear what constitutional basis the Trump administration could use to claim to the contrary. The federal government can’t come into a city and force people off the streets and into detention facilities. And yet, here we are.

This is, I suspect, part of a larger ‘pivot,’ which I’ll return to in another post later today.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest Edblog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: