The Sorrow and the Pity and the Derp

As you can see, we’ve now had a watershed moment in the long-running Brownback/Kansas budgetary train wreck. The Senator-turned-Governor slashed taxes, with the tax shortfall to be made up by increased revenues driven by tax-cut fueled economic growth. The economic growth didn’t happen and the state tumbled in a severe budgetary crisis which Brownback has been trying to find some way out of for months.

Now most of the state’s Republican lawmakers have taken the plunge and violated the “Norquist Pledge” most made never to raise taxes.

But it’s important to step back from the zany headlines and the tears and the not-negligible supply-side-doubting schadenfreude to see the dark, bigger picture. The net effect of everything that has happened has been to shift a major part of the state tax burden from upper-middle class and affluent Kansans to poor and middle class Kansans.

This is the big picture story for much of what has happened in US tax policy over the last four decades. But the story is seldom quite this stark or so tightly chained together in cause and effect.

Most of this new set of tax increases is in sales taxes. Sales taxes are almost by definition regressive since they focus on consumption. But Kansas’s sales tax is particularly regressive since it doesn’t include many of the exemptions which most states make for necessities. Unlike most states, for instance, the Kansas sales tax applies to food you buy at the grocery store (though there is a small off-setting tax credit if you’re really poor.) So get rid of taxes on wealthy people’s incomes and make the money back with sales taxes on family expenditures on food and clothing. In those terms, to borrow President Bush’s phrase, the whole thing has been a catastrophic success.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Edblog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: