The Dumb Money

Over the years, both as an observer of politics and as a publisher, I’ve seen numerous cases where a big advocacy campaign comes together which clearly lacks the ability to spend all the money it’s raised. You’ll see adds run in California against a politician from New York. Or you’ll see TV spots running in time slots or on shows that are totally unrelated to the target demographic. Most campaigns – whether they’re advocacy, election campaigns or branding – are never lucky enough to have this problem. But the amount of messaging or advertising you can do or buy on any given topic is finite. You can so saturate a given market or audience that you not only move past a point of diminishing returns but actually run out of things to buy. That was clearly the case in what has turned out to be the colossal failure of the many tens of million dollar campaign to stop the Iran nuclear deal.

It’s not just that the antis lost. It’s not even just that they apparently had no idea or made no contingency plans for the possibility they could lose this decisively or this early. They also raised and tried to spend far more than it was possible to spend with any hope of affecting the outcome. And they certainly knew that was the case.

AIPAC spent almost $30 million on lobbying against the deal and arguably turned four Democratic Senators – but in point of fact at least two of those four and quite possibly all four of them would have voted no even if AIPAC had sat out the fight. In other words, they didn’t just lose. They got jack for their money – one of many reasons they’re now attacking Netanyahu for screwing the pooch with his March speech.

But it’s not just AIPAC. There were a slew of front groups spun up to oppose this deal even though the chances of scuttling it were dubious. The folks who ran those groups clearly soaked up a lot of dumb money the owners of which didn’t know that their dollars were almost certainly going to be wasted. Again, not just because the odds were long. These folks would have spent even on long odds – but because they were raising amounts of money that were just much more than could be spent.

Now a lot of those folks are seeing their scare ads still running or only ramping up after the whole thing is over. For whatever else we can draw from this, a lot of hard right DC operatives effectively swindled a bunch of billionaire oligarchs out of quite a nice chunk of money.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Edblog
  • |
    September 29, 2022 6:20 p.m.

    Do take a moment to reach Josh Kovensky’s report here on Judge Cannon’s latest order. It’s hard to capture just…

  • |
    September 29, 2022 4:32 p.m.

    A new episode of The Josh Marshall Podcast is live! This week, Josh and Kate discuss a charcuterie tray of…

  • |
    September 29, 2022 3:36 p.m.

    The DC insider sheets are already buzzing about the exciting news: House Republicans plan a new round of debt limit…

  • |
    September 29, 2022 12:24 p.m.

    If you look recent polls there’s definitely a drift away from Democrats in a number of key races. The shifts…

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: