So Where Are We Here?

Updated at 8:47 PM eastern

As always, it’s fascinating to hear from you about what you hear from your senators on a Roe protecting bill and the filibuster. I wanted to give you a quick summary of what we’ve heard so far.

So far we have these Senators who have either publicly stated support for a Roe bill and changed filibuster rules or their offices told constituents that they did.

Yes and Yes

Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)

Tammy Baldwin (WI)

Cory Booker (NJ)

Bernie Sanders (VT)

Pat Leahy/Peter Welch (VT)

Maggie Hassan (NH)

Michael Bennet (CO)

Pretty Clear

TPM Reader CK spoke to staffers from Sen. Feinstein and Padilla. Those staffers both said they supported reforming the filibuster and also Roe legislation but weren’t sure if they had spoken specifically to the two together. So pretty close but a bit of ambiguity.

For some reason that isn’t clear to me multiple Massachusetts TPM Readers had all their calls go to voicemail at the offices of Sens. Warren and Markey. (Warren especially has been pretty clear on her opposition to the filibuster on apparently everything.)

Officially HMMM

Jack Reed’s office told TPM Reader MK that Reed supported Roe-protecting legislation but the staffer wasn’t sure about changing the filibuster rules to allow it to pass.

A staffer in Robert Menendez’s office who spoke to TPM Reader DM did not want to answer.

A staffer in the office of Angus King told TPM Reader PL that he definitely supported a Roe bill but that he “struggled” over the filibuster. The conversation went on from there describing his struggles, fears that Republicans would pass bills, etc. This is not surprising. King was one of the hardest to convince on the voting rights carve out that 48 senators voted for a few months ago.

TPM Reader AB was told by staffers in the offices of Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray that neither has taken a public stance on the issue, that Cantwell, according to a staffer, “supports a talking filibuster.”

What have you heard?

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Edblog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: