In this late post below, I discussed the now very consistent polling errors overestimating Donald Trump’s margins over Nikki Haley. I get why some analysts are quick to dismiss the larger import of this phenomenon: people assume you can draw direct, linear conclusions about a general election from polling anomalies in a primary election. And you can’t. But as I said last night, it’s a mistake to say this means nothing. G. Elliot Morris, the new head of 538, has a good piece up about this. The gist is that because of a mix of those sampling and modeling issues discussed in yesterday’s Backchannel, pollsters seem to be having a hard time finding normie Republicans. Needless to say there aren’t many of them these days. And that is part of the polling challenge. But these primaries show they are there and that pollsters seem to be missing a non-trivial number of them.
LATEST
News
After Chaotic Primary, Sen. Sullivan, Mary Peltola Head for the General Elections in Alaska
08.19.26 | 8:25 am
News
Florida Voters Reject Cory Mills’ Reelection Bid Amid Dating Violence Allegations
08.19.26 | 8:24 am
Where Things Stand
Slotkin Asks Hegseth to Confirm He Won’t Send Troops to Polls
08.18.26 | 5:39 pm
Cafe
How the Supreme Court Kicked Off America’s Sports Betting Addiction Crisis
08.18.26 | 1:51 pm