In this late post below, I discussed the now very consistent polling errors overestimating Donald Trump’s margins over Nikki Haley. I get why some analysts are quick to dismiss the larger import of this phenomenon: people assume you can draw direct, linear conclusions about a general election from polling anomalies in a primary election. And you can’t. But as I said last night, it’s a mistake to say this means nothing. G. Elliot Morris, the new head of 538, has a good piece up about this. The gist is that because of a mix of those sampling and modeling issues discussed in yesterday’s Backchannel, pollsters seem to be having a hard time finding normie Republicans. Needless to say there aren’t many of them these days. And that is part of the polling challenge. But these primaries show they are there and that pollsters seem to be missing a non-trivial number of them.
LATEST
Galleries
What the ‘Federal Invasion’ of Minneapolis Looks Like on the Ground: Photos
01.16.26 | 2:56 pm
News
There’s More at Stake Than Just Interest Rates. Here’s What Trump Could Do With the Whole Federal Reserve Toolkit
01.16.26 | 2:07 pm
Morning Memo
Renee Good Suffered Multiple Gunshot Wounds
01.16.26 | 10:40 am
Where Things Stand
Senate Takes Big Step Toward Funding Gov’t as Some Dems Demand ICE Constraints
01.15.26 | 5:44 pm