Marco Rubio says he purchased a gun on Christmas Eve to protect his family from ISIS or other attackers. I’m just going to leave it at that. Not sure more information is necessary.
Here’s a disturbing update from the Oregon militant standoff. Robert “LaVoy” Finicum, one of the most colorful militants, says that Arizona child protective services has removed four foster children, apparently all boys, from his care because of his involvement in the standoff.
When I was a small boy my dad and I would watch the great prize fights of the day. Ali v Frazier, Ali v Foreman, Ali v Spinks. Boxing is a terrible, brutal sport. But there is a beauty in watching these greats, often perfectly matched, do battle. Back during the phony war period of the Cruz/Trump confrontation I noted that we may be witnessing a comparable battle of two titans. “That,” I wrote, “is one of the many things that makes the current Trump-Cruz phony war so compelling. Trump is baiting Cruz into the same smackdown he’s used to eat up Bush, Walker, Fiorina and others. But Cruz won’t take the bait. Like two zen masters facing off in a martial arts classic or perhaps two wizards doing battle in The Lord of the Rings, we have an epic confrontation between two masters who have trained for decades in the arts of assholery and bullying. But their powers equally matched, it is a stand off.”
I sense that a major shift happened over the last three or four days culminating in last night’s debate, though it is all but unnoticed. It is not only clear that Donald Trump is now the odds on favorite to be the Republican nominee – GOP party regulars are increasingly comfortable or resigned to the prospect. They seem more worried about the prospect of Ted Cruz as the party nominee. Cruz isn’t now the highly imperfect Stop Trump candidate. Trump is taking the role of the Stop Cruz candidate.
The first Bundy militant was arrested in Oregon today by federal officials. You’re probably saying, “About time!”
But the nature of the arrest really captures the ridiculously virtual nature of the ‘stand-off’. 62 year old Kenneth Medenbach had headed out from the compound to the local Safeway, presumably to stock up on milk, flour, Twizzlers, whatever. But that doesn’t seem to be why he was arrested, not precisely. He was arrested not only because he was off the compound and presumably easy to arrest but because he’d taken a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service vehicle!
Fascinating new story about how Ted Cruz ended up not working in the Bush White House after working on the 2000 campaign.
City official resigns after asking male bus driver to dress up as old lady.
Last night I noted that Ted Cruz’s blanket claim that there’s zero chance that his presidential eligibility is in question is simply false. He stood behind his own expertise as a lawyer who’s argued multiple cases before the Supreme Court to say that this simply is not a serious issue. Indeed, Ari Melber, the legal expert on MSNBC and an acquaintance of mine, was on the air this morning and said:
To be fair to Ted Cruz and the issue here, this is not taken that seriously in legal circles that [it] would be something that would bar him from running or being president. It’s true when Donald Trump and others have repeated that this exact question has not been resolved by the federal courts, let alone the Supreme Court. So in that sense, because it is rare and an arcane sentence, it’s accurate to say, we don’t know for certain.
I am not in a position to be too critical of this statement because this is what I myself thought as recently as a week ago, and I said as much. But it’s actually not accurate. The fact that Cruz was so definitive, so absolute, should and will force an on-going conversation, interwoven into the presidential campaign, which will show it’s not true.
Here’s another piece of the puzzle on Ted Cruz’s eligibility. Bryan A. Garner has written a “legal memorandum” at the Atlantic on the various legal questions that come into play in determining with Cruz is a natural born citizen. As with other serious looks at the issue in recent days, I’m struck by how complicated, unsettled, and genuinely up in the air the legal question actually is.
Garner ultimately concludes that a court would find Cruz to be eligible, but it’s not an easy or straightforward call, and it’s predicated on several untested assumptions precisely because there are not prior court rulings that you can point to and say, ah ha!, this is the definitive answer. But one part of his analysis in particular jumped out as a key element.
Mark Fenster, a University of Florida law professor and expert on conspiracy theories, will visit the Hive for a chat with Prime members today at 2PM Eastern.