I want to add a quick addendum to today’s Backchannel about Democrats saying “no” to interest groups. This comes out of an exchange I had with TPM Reader CC. She argued a number of reasons that she sees gay marriage and trans rights as substantively quite different from each other. (For context, in her email she notes that she is “a lesbian who benefitted from the marriage equality movement.”) I actually agreed with most of her points. So let me make my argument a bit more specific and clear. I’m not arguing the two issues are substantively the same. I’m observing the general point that in 2003/2004 marriage equality was clearly opposed by a majority of Americans. The argument being put forward now is that Democrats shouldn’t be getting behind any position or issue that a majority of voters oppose. It’s fair to look back 20 years and consider how that framework would apply in that case.
LATEST
News
Cornyn Threatens to Block Trump Noms Over Unreleased PEPFAR Funds — And Quickly Relents
07.22.26 | 2:20 pm
Five Points
5 Points on Trump’s Loyal Labor Secretary Nominee
07.22.26 | 2:18 pm
Morning Memo
New Attack Launched Against Trump’s Corrupt US Attorney Scheme
07.22.26 | 10:25 am
Cafe
The Right’s New Country Club: Inside the Bizarre World of Luxury Gun Clubs
07.22.26 | 8:00 am