I want to add a quick addendum to today’s Backchannel about Democrats saying “no” to interest groups. This comes out of an exchange I had with TPM Reader CC. She argued a number of reasons that she sees gay marriage and trans rights as substantively quite different from each other. (For context, in her email she notes that she is “a lesbian who benefitted from the marriage equality movement.”) I actually agreed with most of her points. So let me make my argument a bit more specific and clear. I’m not arguing the two issues are substantively the same. I’m observing the general point that in 2003/2004 marriage equality was clearly opposed by a majority of Americans. The argument being put forward now is that Democrats shouldn’t be getting behind any position or issue that a majority of voters oppose. It’s fair to look back 20 years and consider how that framework would apply in that case.
LATEST
The Weekender
The Authoritarianism Will Be Televised
01.10.26 | 8:00 am
News
Photos: Anti-ICE Protests Erupt Nationwide After Minneapolis and Portland Shootings
01.09.26 | 1:24 pm
Cafe
‘Shared Decision-Making’ for Childhood Vaccines Sounds Empowering. But More ‘Choice’ Can Mean Less Access.
01.09.26 | 12:11 pm
Morning Memo
The Cover-up of the Fatal ICE Shooting Is Already Underway
01.09.26 | 11:27 am