I want to add a quick addendum to today’s Backchannel about Democrats saying “no” to interest groups. This comes out of an exchange I had with TPM Reader CC. She argued a number of reasons that she sees gay marriage and trans rights as substantively quite different from each other. (For context, in her email she notes that she is “a lesbian who benefitted from the marriage equality movement.”) I actually agreed with most of her points. So let me make my argument a bit more specific and clear. I’m not arguing the two issues are substantively the same. I’m observing the general point that in 2003/2004 marriage equality was clearly opposed by a majority of Americans. The argument being put forward now is that Democrats shouldn’t be getting behind any position or issue that a majority of voters oppose. It’s fair to look back 20 years and consider how that framework would apply in that case.
LATEST
Cafe
Tectonic Shifts in Statehouses Matter More Than Congressional Wins
11.07.26 | 8:00 am
The Weekender
When It Comes to Defeating MAGA, It’s Not About Getting Even
11.07.26 | 8:00 am
News
MyPillow Guy Mike Lindell Had The World’s Most Predictable Reaction To The Blue Wave
11.06.26 | 6:02 pm
News
Three Out From Trump DOJ After Midterms Shellacking
11.06.26 | 3:19 pm