I want to add a quick addendum to today’s Backchannel about Democrats saying “no” to interest groups. This comes out of an exchange I had with TPM Reader CC. She argued a number of reasons that she sees gay marriage and trans rights as substantively quite different from each other. (For context, in her email she notes that she is “a lesbian who benefitted from the marriage equality movement.”) I actually agreed with most of her points. So let me make my argument a bit more specific and clear. I’m not arguing the two issues are substantively the same. I’m observing the general point that in 2003/2004 marriage equality was clearly opposed by a majority of Americans. The argument being put forward now is that Democrats shouldn’t be getting behind any position or issue that a majority of voters oppose. It’s fair to look back 20 years and consider how that framework would apply in that case.
Latest

13 hours ago
‘Woefully Insufficient’: Trump DOJ Keeps Giving Alien Enemies Act Judge The Runaround

2 days ago
Judge Denies Emergency Relief For Fired USIP Members After Armed DOGE Takeover

2 days ago
Emails Reveal Top IRS Lawyer Warned Trump Firings Were a ‘Fraud’ on the Courts

2 days ago
Incredulous Judge Gives Admin One Day Reprieve On Producing Evidence On Flouted Court Order
Latest Editors' Blog
-
|March 20, 2025 10:04 p.m.
From TPM Reader BM … I was shocked that Paul Weiss, of all firms, capitulated, but not surprised. When Trump…
-
|March 20, 2025 9:47 p.m.
Pretty surreal moment today. Paul, Weiss is one of three firms targeted in new Trump executive orders. The firm’s chairman,…
-
|March 20, 2025 6:16 p.m.
My favorite congressman, Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY), has been cheering on the DOGE wilding spree down in DC. And now…
-
|March 20, 2025 5:04 p.m.
I am and we are still putting together information on this. First, this is a call to see who reading…