How The Obamacare Town Hall Script Totally Flipped This Week

UNITED STATES - AUGUST 29: Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., talks with officials during a tour of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Colo., August 29, 2014. Coffman is being challenged by Democr... UNITED STATES - AUGUST 29: Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., talks with officials during a tour of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Colo., August 29, 2014. Coffman is being challenged by Democratic Andrew Romanoff for Colorado's 6th Congressional District seat. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Darren Knowles never met with Mike Coffman in the seven years the congressman had been serving Colorado’s 6th Congressional District. But Knowles and his wife, concerned about congressional Republicans’ imminent plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act, made the decision to drive over to Coffman’s town hall event Saturday at Aurora Central Library.

A special education teacher who voted for George W. Bush twice and for Hillary Clinton in the November election, Knowles was surprised to find the lobby filled beyond capacity with Coloradans from across the ideological spectrum hoping to get reassurance from Coffman that they would not lose health care coverage. He observed that many attendees were white and older, and that a number were physically disabled. The Knowleses waited two hours to speak to their congressman, who met with constituents in groups for four or five minutes apiece, but never got the chance. A local journalist called to the scene by the frustrated crowd eventually caught Coffman sneaking out the backdoor of the library before his scheduled time had expired.

Knowles left exasperated, and was further irritated by a statement Coffman released blaming “partisan activists” for trying to disrupt his event.

“That really got my blood boiling,” he told TPM in a phone interview. “He said he’d stand up to Trump and this is like Trump’s playbook right here: blame the people who stand up to you. I don’t know what Representative Coffman wanted. If we’re concerned, are we not supposed to show up and voice our concerns?”

The August congressional recess prior to the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act was marked by testy town hall clashes between lawmakers and constituents who opposed the health care legislation. Now, more than seven years later, Republicans’ attempted repeal of that legislation is unfolding in the same public, messy way.

Since Congress passed a budget resolution last week allowing repeal to proceed, voters who have personally benefited from the law have appealed to Republican members of Congress at town hall events in their districts. Others have linked up with members of local progressive groups formed since the election to pressure the incoming Trump administration, or participated in nationwide rallies organized by Democratic leadership.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) was drowned out with chants of “save our healthcare” as she spoke at a Martin Luther King, Jr. Day rally in Spokane. More than 250 people turned out to the Gerald R. Ford Library in Grand Rapids on Tuesday to question Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) about Medicaid cuts and the details of an ACA replacement plan, prompting security to turn dozens away. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) was surprised to find himself facing angry questions from a group of 50 at a Houston Chamber of Commerce session billed as an opportunity for locals “affected by Obamacare” to share stories about “rising costs and loss of coverage.”

With all three branches of government soon to be under GOP control, these voters know they may not be able to prevent Republicans from charging ahead with repeal. But they aren’t going to let it happen without a fight.

After learning about the meeting with Brady through a progressive Facebook group, Emily Hoppel said she showed up with her 2-year-old son to ask how women’s health care would be affected by the millions of dollars in Medicaid reimbursements that Planned Parenthood stands to lose when the ACA is repealed.

“Rep. Brady did not adequately address anyone’s questions, in my opinion,” Hoppel told TPM in an email. “He repeatedly assured attendees that they would not lose the parts of ACA that they like (protections for pre-existing conditions and coverage of dependent adult children) while simultaneously promising to do away with the mandate and taxes. That’s a two-legged stool waiting to fall over.”

Other progressives were working alongside the national Democratic Party to kick up a public fuss over ACA repeal. Thousands showed up to a Sunday “Save Our Healthcare” rally led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) in Macomb County, Michigan, which went for Trump. Numerous smaller satellite demonstrations were held across the country as well.

In Keene, New Hampshire, multimedia artist and diehard Sanders fan Heather Stockwell helped draw around 200 people out to a Sunday rally. The support from the national Democratic party was “great for getting numbers out,” Stockwell told TPM.

After being involved with a number of regional liberal organizations over the course of the 2016 election, Stockwell this week helped consolidate several of those groups into the Monadnock Progressive Alliance, an umbrella organization focused on taking an issue-oriented, hyper-local approach to progressive change.

Stockwell said she drew inspiration for the MPA in part from the Indivisible Guide, an online handbook put together by former Congressional aides that encourages Democrats to take a page out of the tea party playbook in order to derail the Trump-Paul Ryan policy agenda. Their advice boiled down to the following: confront your representatives on their home turf, organize locally and direct resources towards stopping specific pieces of legislation.

Harvard University professor Theda Skocpol, who co-wrote “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism,” said she saw some tea party tactics at play in this week’s coordinated protests in favor of the ACA.

“In the past, Democrats have tended to focus on Washington” when they disagreed with elected officials on policy issues, Skocpol told TPM.

“Democrats also see protest as something that’s aimed at the media,” she said. “I think the added ingredient here borrowed from the tea party is that it’s really effective to speak up both publicly and in terms of contacting local offices of their representatives in Congress.”

The key distinction, according to Skocpol, is that the tea party coalesced in backlash at the institutional GOP that allowed Barack Obama to be elected, while Democratic leadership is actively encouraging and participating in the current public outcry over ACA repeal.

Health care is also a uniquely easy rallying point for progressives hoping to mobilize resistance against the new administration because the need for health insurance transcends political boundaries.

“Any cuts that occur in this law are going to hit Trump voters very hard, and the areas that supported him too,” Skocpol said. “They’re going to hit older, non-urban whites just as hard as they’re going to hit the Democratic constituencies.”

After using the ACA as a political punching bag for years and failing to agree on a replacement plan, Republican lawmakers are finally facing the real-life consequences of inaction, from voters on both sides of the aisle.

Have more stories about lawmakers facing pushback over ACA repeal or organizing efforts around the issue? Let us know at talk@talkingpointsmemo.com

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. It’s great to hear that Democrats and progressives are organizing and making their voices heard in favor of ACA. The GOP has spent years vilifying the law without proposing an alternative. Now the chickens are coming home to roost. In the end, I hope they’ll see it’s easier to tweak the ACA rather than blow it up. But if they decide to replace it with Medicare for all, that wouldn’t bother me one bit. Not going to hold my breath, though.

  2. Excellent article, Ms. Kirkland! Thank you for your thorough, incisive work on this topic.

  3. Good. Let the Republicans feel the pain.

    Better yet get them on record as to why the government has no role in affordable health care :stuck_out_tongue:

  4. I read an article along time ago stating the GOP was using Obamacare for politico reasons. Ie… Stoking up anger, fund raising etc… The GOP loved Obamacare to stir chit up. It’s why it never had a replacement.

    NOW by winning the GOP has to come up with a plan. Really Obamacare is based off a GOP plan. Only a few choices here. Improve Obamacare which is what people really want done. Repeal it and put something similar to Obamacare in place. Medicare for all or a single payer system. Any choice will upset a certain segment of politico ideology.

  5. I like that people are showing up… I just wish all the people getting screwed by this had voted for Hillary and Democratic Senators last November.

    A dark, angry part of me does not want to spare them this pain. Let America get what it deserves, since clearly it is in need of a cautionary tale of what can happen if you don’t think before you vote. Trump is going to do exactly what he showed he would do during the campaign: lie, cheat, and whine. Not much else.

    I don’t want the bleeding to stop until every Trump voter has to stop and ask themselves, “Oh God! What have we done?”

    If this country so desperately needs a wake up call… I don’t want to spare them the pain. I want them to feel it so that they remember it for a generation.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

111 more replies

Participants

Avatar for charliee Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for jep07 Avatar for downriverdem Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for tetrisd Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for dickweed Avatar for gharlane Avatar for tena Avatar for beattycat Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for timbo Avatar for katscherger Avatar for littlecatfeet Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for win Avatar for electricmark Avatar for hayduke2017

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: