Michiganders Concerned About ACA Repeal Interrupt GOPer At Town Hall

In a Sept. 24, 2011 photo, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., is seen during the Republican Leadership Conference at the Grand Hotel on Mackinac Island, Mich. Amash is being challenged by Democrat Steve Pestka. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) was repeatedly interrupted by constituents concerned about the repeal of the Affordable Care Act during a packed Tuesday town hall in Grand Rapids, MLive.com reported.

A number of the 250 people who filled the auditorium at the Gerald R. Ford Museum pressed Amash to explain how the healthcare law could be repealed without taking insurance away from the millions of Americans it covers. Dozens more were turned away from the venue due to lack of space.

“Do you or do you not support the immediate repeal of the Affordable Care Act with or without a replacement?” one attendee asked, according to MLive.

Amash said he believed that individual states should be tasked with replacing the federal law, prompting cries of dissent from the crowd, the newspaper reported.

“You can have a repeal that is triggered by state replacement,” he clarified, according to MLive. “In other words, you pass legislation to repeal. As states replace the legislation, then the repeal is triggered in that state. That is what I’m talking about.”

Amash last week joined eight other Republicans and Democrats to vote against a budget reconciliation measure intended to begin the process of dismantling the ACA. He cited the trillions of dollars that the measure predicted would be added to the federal budget in coming years as the source of his opposition.

This vote failed to assuage the concerns of his constituents. Some expressed concern about a lapsed timeline between the law’s repeal and replacement, while others asked if a GOP replacement plan could cut Medicare benefits, according to video posted online by a member of Indivisible West Michigan.

After Amash referred to the healthcare law as “Obamacare,” a number of audience members interrupted to insist that he call it the “Affordable Care Act” instead.

The lawmaker drew applause when he said he did not vote for Donald Trump and when he urged Americans to try to look past partisan divides, according to the newspaper.

A number of other Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) and Rep. Mike Coffman (R-CO), have been confronted by voters concerned about ACA repeal at town hall events and rallies over the last few days.

Latest Livewire
50
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Michigan’s representative to the Electoral College cast their votes for Trump. The state should accept whatever happens during Trump’s term, good or bad, right?

  2. Michiganders Concerned About ACA Repeal Interrupt GOPer At Town Hall

    They should not worry to much about ACA, Ole Trump is going to create hundreds of thousands of great jobs in Michigan alone. Those jobs will be high paying and include medical, retirement and all kinds of beautiful benefits. Just like he promised them.

  3. “Amash said he believed that individual states should be tasked with replacing the federal law, prompting cries of dissent from the crowd, the newspaper reported.”

    Soooo, would this mean each state has its own rules for handling the individual market/high risk pools, subsidies, etc? Under this it would seem that if you were covered by an individual policy, and you move, you might end up with insurance that doesn’t qualify under your new home state’s coverage rules (I can definitely see this happening moving from a red to blue state)? Or that you might be hit by very different premiums moving from state to state. Am I missing something here or is this really as byzantine and ridiculous as it seems?

  4. States have rights ya know.
    Yes, it is as Byzantine as it seems to you. I think that’s part of the plan.

  5. Six months in, and the great unwashed, too many of whom voted for the Donald, will be howling for a snap Congressional election to replace both House and Senate Rethugs.

    Pretty much the entirety of the incoming administration is bent on fucking over anyone not wealthy. Could this finally be the last time people of this socio-economic stratum stop voting against their own interests?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

44 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for charliee Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for dv01 Avatar for pickwick Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for tetrisd Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for jurisgal Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for cincypix Avatar for gajake Avatar for ncgirl741 Avatar for pauldownard Avatar for isthisrob Avatar for saygoodnightgracie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: