McConnell’s Shutdown Conundrum

There is “no possibility of a government shutdown” in the new Republican Congress, incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told TIME magazine after his party’s blowout victory on Tuesday night.

But the Kentucky Republican simultaneously promised to use government funding bills to rein in President Barack Obama’s regulations and executive actions, saying there will be “prescriptions of certain things that we think he ought not to be doing by either reducing the funding or restricting the funding.”

These two stances — expressed by McConnell throughout the 2014 campaign — expose a strategic dilemma. President Barack Obama will carry the veto pen for another two years, which means the only foolproof leverage the new Republican Congress will have to force policy reforms he opposes is the threat of a government shutdown, through the power of the purse.

Without that, there would be little downside to vetoing legislation.

Asked about the possibility of executive action on immigration, McConnell told TIME that “the way that you push back on executive overreach is through the funding process.” Republicans have also expressed enthusiasm for using the funding process to unwind environmental regulations and health care reforms.

The conundrum: if there’s no threat of a shutdown, there’s no clear motivation for Obama to sign legislation that unwinds his main achievements. Conservatives like Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT) recognized this in 2013 when they led the Republican House into a shutdown over the prospect of defunding Obamacare. But it failed because Obama refused to budge.

It’s plausible that Obama will be more inclined to accept Republican-led legislation that’s passed by the new Congress. Without the “firewall” of a Democratic-led Senate, he’s likely to see more bills on his desk that he doesn’t like. But when it comes to his signature executive moves, the most powerful weapon in McConnell’s arsenal sounds like one he’s hesitant to use.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: