House Panel Announces Probe Into Trump’s Doral G7 Plans

Trump National Doral in Miami (MICHELE EVE SANDBERG/AFP/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House Judiciary Committee announced Wednesday that it would investigate President Trump’s efforts to host an international summit at his golf resort in Florida.

The probe will be part of the House Democrats’ broader examination of potential Trump violations of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which restricts the President from receiving things of value from foreign governments.

With the new revelations that Trump is pushing to hold the next G7 summit at his Doral resort, the committee “will take further investigative steps, including scheduling hearings and requesting additional documents from the White House,” chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said in a statement.

Nadler said the possible Emoluments Clause violations “are of significant interest and grave concern to the Committee as it considers whether to recommend articles of impeachment. ”

“Hosting the G7 Summit at Doral implicates both the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses, because it would entail both foreign and U.S. government spending to benefit the President, the latter potentially including both federal and state expenditures,” Nadler said. “More importantly, the Doral decision reflects perhaps the first publicly known instance in which foreign governments would be required to pay President Trump’s private businesses in order to conduct business with the United States.”

That Trump was pitching Doral as a G7 host was first reported in June and the President confirmed his interest in holding the summit there in comments promoting the resort this week.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    What’s to probe… it is a blatant violation of the emoluments clause…

    Impeach the MFer already

  2. Really???

    That could explain why the WH is pulling back on the inopportune statement.

    The justification will be that he was just joking.

    I still wanna see what happens when that defense is used in a legitimate trial for the crimes of this administration.

    ETA: Of course, if he never does it, there’s nothing to prosecute, but what about Barr’s party in December - that worth investigating (because the reservation is already made, so the intent is clear)???

  3. Get all their filthy laundry out in public, Jerry!

  4. Avatar for docd docd says:

    My first thought was “this explains the second thoughts about the G7 at the Doral” and then I remembered that this WH would just stonewall the information until SCOTUS said that it was OK to ignore the Constitution. I’m back to thinking that the Secret Service and every other security agency in the G7 said “look at the map, doofus–no way can we have that meeting under the runway of an international airport. Who would build a resort there? Idiot.”

  5. Avatar for enn enn says:

    Don’t you know that certain children when they hear NO, want it even more.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

79 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for 1gg Avatar for becca656 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for inversion Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for slimjim33 Avatar for beattycat Avatar for daulphin Avatar for tsp Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for noonm Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for brian512 Avatar for tpr Avatar for skeptical Avatar for carolson Avatar for zillacop

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: