Vulnerable Democrat Gives Stunningly Strong Defense Of Obamacare At Hearing

In this Wednesday, April 16, 2014 photo, Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., listens during an appearance in Durham, N.C. Hagan has tried for her first 5 1/2 years in the U.S. Senate to persuade North Carolina voters that being ... In this Wednesday, April 16, 2014 photo, Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., listens during an appearance in Durham, N.C. Hagan has tried for her first 5 1/2 years in the U.S. Senate to persuade North Carolina voters that being in the middle of the road is a good thing. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In a flipping of the proverbial script, a Senate Democrat facing a tough re-election race used a confirmation hearing of Sylvia Mathews Burwell, nominated to head the Department of Health and Human Services, to advocate forcefully in favor of Obamacare.

While Republican senators mostly went through the motions with their anti-Obamacare talking points or outright endorsed Burwell as Kathleen Sebelius’s replacement, Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC) used her time to trumpet the benefits of Medicaid expansion — and emphasize the downside of not expanding.

Left unsaid, but strongly implied, was that her opponent, North Carolina House Speaker Thom Tillis, who locked up the GOP nomination earlier this week, had been instrumental in stopping the state from expanding Medicaid under the law.

“Last year in North Carolina, our state legislature and governor decided against expanding the state’s Medicaid program,” Hagan said as she started her questioning, “and as a result, about 500,000 people who would have qualified for coverage through Medicaid are not now able to do so.”

“These are some of the most vulnerable in our society,” she said, “who will continue to seek care in emergency rooms and then will leave chronic conditions unmanaged, which we know is detrimental to their health and the economy.”

Hagan is one of the most vulnerable Senate Democrats, holding a slim 0.8 percent polling advantage over Tillis per Real Clear Politics. She has been one of the targets in the American for Prosperity’s air campaign, which has attacked her for her support of the law.

“We’ve already seen a decrease in the number of uninsured” in Medicaid-expanding states, Burwell said after Hagan asked to compare the experiences of states that had expanded and states, like North Carolina, that had not.

Hagan then gave the example of a 35-year-old single woman whose income is below the federal poverty level — therefore falling in the Medicaid expansion gap, which in non-expanding states means that those Americans will not have access to health coverage under Obamacare.

“So if a state had expanded it, she would have had access,” Hagan said, “where in the 24 states that haven’t expanded it, there is this huge number of people, in my state, 500,000, that are still without coverage.”

Burwell said those people would not be subject to the law’s individual mandate, but added: “It doesn’t address the fundamental issue that you’re talking about which is: Do they have health care coverage?”

Hagan completed her line of questioning by asking how much it would cost states to expand Medicaid in 2014, surely knowing that the federal government covers 100 percent of the costs through 2016.

“That would be zero,” Burwell said. “The state doesn’t pay.”

In contrast to Hagan’s aggressive pro-Obamacare performance, Republican senators were reserved. Almost none of the expected fire made an appearance. They hit the necessary talking points — canceled health plans, the Medicare payment board characterized as “death panel” by the far right and the disastrous launch of — but rarely pressed Burwell on her responses.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who is not a member of the committee, actually introduced Burwell at the beginning of the hearing. A few Republican members, Sens. Johnny Isakson (GA) and Richard Burr (NC), didn’t broach Obamacare at all in their questioning.

Burr, in fact, stated his strong endorsement of Burwell’s nomination and quick confirmation as he left.

“I support her nomination and I will vote for it. She doesn’t come with a single experience that would make her a good secretary. She comes with a portfolio of experience,” he said. “I look forward to her confirmation being quick.”

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. GOOD FOR HAGEN! Don’t run from Obamacare. Go at those GOP bastards with it.

  2. After the NYtimes poll that showed a surprisingly large amount of support for the ACA in NC, the best thing she can do is simply point to the facts, while Tillis has nothing to offer except a promise to take away health care from the others.
    You know who they are.

  3. Avatar for jjpm jjpm says:

    People are already seeing the benefits of ACA, when the 70% of people that already had insurance, see the savings from it on their ins., the right is screwed.

  4. Good to hear a Democrat with backbone. The Repugs and Libertarians who hate Obamacare aren’t going to ever vote for her; but if I lived in her state, I would be much more motivated to get to the polls and vote for her no matter what.

  5. Not quite true. As you’ll notice, she only talks about the Medicaid expansion as a separate issue, without mentioning the overall law.

    Other Dems have been doing this too: attacking their opponents on the Medicaid expansion, which is popular, but avoiding mentioning the law as a whole.

    So this isn’t really new, not an “all-in” defense of Obamacare.

Continue the discussion at

83 more replies


Avatar for kenneth_thomas Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for jsfox Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sooner Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for jep07 Avatar for lew Avatar for chammy Avatar for ronocca Avatar for glblank Avatar for rwc2 Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for sdcga161 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for gr Avatar for foolmemore Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for Cascadian Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for NCBlue Avatar for bubbanerdus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: