Veterans Groups Push Back On Possible VA-Pentagon Health System Merger

Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin speaks at the National Press Club in Washington, Monday, Nov. 6, 2017. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin speaks at the National Press Club in Washington, Monday, Nov. 6, 2017. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — As part of its effort to expand private health care, the Department of Veterans Affairs is exploring the possibility of merging its health system with the Pentagon’s, a cost-saving measure that veterans groups say could threaten the viability of VA hospitals and clinics.

VA spokesman Curt Cashour called the plan a potential “game-changer” that would “provide better care for veterans at a lower cost to taxpayers,” but he provided no specific details.

Griffin Anderson, a spokesman for the Democrats on the House Veterans Affairs Committee, said the proposal — developed without input from Congress — would amount to a merger of the VA’s Choice and the military’s TRICARE private health care programs. Committee Democrats independently confirmed the discussions involved TRICARE.

News of the plan stirred alarm from veterans groups, who said they had not been consulted, even as VA urges a long-term legislative fix for Choice by year’s end.

Health care experts also expressed surprise that VA would consider a TRICARE merger to provide private care for millions of active-duty troops, military retirees and veterans. The two departments generally serve very different patient groups —older, sicker veterans treated by VA and generally healthier service members, retirees and their families covered by TRICARE.

TRICARE is insurance that is paid by the government, but uses private doctors and hospitals. The VA provides most of its care via medical centers and clinics owned and run by the federal government, though veterans can also see private doctors through VA’s Choice program with referrals by VA if appointments aren’t readily available.

“My overarching concern is these are very dramatic changes in the way health care is delivered to veterans,” said Carrie Farmer, a senior policy researcher on military care at Rand Corp., who has conducted wide-ranging research for VA. “There haven’t been studies on what the consequences are in terms of both costs and quality of care.”

Navy Commander Sarah Higgins, a Pentagon spokeswoman, confirmed it was exploring with VA “many possible opportunities to strengthen and streamline the health of our service members and veterans.” She declined to comment on specifics “unless and until there is something to announce.”

In its statement to The Associated Press, Cashour explained that VA Secretary David Shulkin was working with the White House and the Pentagon to explore “the general concept” of integrating VA and Pentagon health care, building upon an already planned merger of electronic health care records between VA and the Pentagon. Because Shulkin has said an overhaul of VA’s electronic medical records won’t be completed for another seven to eight years, an effort such as a TRICARE merger couldn’t likely happen before then.

“This is part of the president’s efforts to transform how government works and is precisely the type of businesslike, commonsense approach that rarely exists in Washington,” Cashour said.

At least four of the nation’s largest veterans’ organizations — The American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, AMVETS and Disabled American Veterans — called a TRICARE merger a likely “non-starter” if it sought to transform VA care into an insurance plan.

“VA is a health care provider and the VFW would oppose any effort to erode the system specifically created to serve the health care needs of our nation’s veterans by reducing VA’s role to a payer of care for veterans,” said Bob Wallace, executive director of VFW’s Washington office.

Louis Celli, director of veterans’ affairs and rehabilitation for The American Legion, said any attempts to outsource services away from VA medical centers and clinics would be financially unsustainable and likely shift costs unfairly onto veterans with service-connected disabilities.

He noted something similar occurred with TRICARE — military retirees were promised free care from military base hospitals. But then TRICARE began offering insurance to use private-sector care and TRICARE beneficiary co-pays are now rising. “The precedent the TRICARE model sets is not something we would accept on the VA side,” Celli said.

During the 2016 campaign, President Donald Trump pledged to fix VA by expanding access to private doctors. In July, he promised to triple the number of veterans “seeing the doctor of their choice.” More than 30 percent of VA appointments are made in the private sector.

Some groups have drawn political battle lines, with the left-leaning VoteVets and the American Federation of Government Employees warning of privatization and Concerned Veterans for America, backed by the billionaire conservative Koch brothers, pledging a well-funded campaign to give veterans wide freedom to see private doctors.

Rep. Tim Walz of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the House Veterans Affairs Committee, said the quiet discussions to integrate TRICARE with VA’s Choice were evidence “the White House was taking steps to force unprecedented numbers of veterans into the private sector for their care.”

“The fact that the Trump administration has been having these secret conversations behind the backs of Congress and our nation’s veterans is absolutely unacceptable,” said Walz, the highest-ranking enlisted service member to serve in Congress. He called for an immediate public explanation “without delay.”

A spokeswoman for Rep. Phil Roe of Tennessee, the Republican chairman of the House committee, said he planned to continue proceeding with his bipartisan legislative plan to fix Choice without integrating TRICARE.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. For those that need a clearer picture of what’s said above: The VA as all know is Veterans organization. It provides healthcare via it’s clinics and hospitals scattered all over America. If you live far from a VA clinic you can go to a private clinic and the VA will pay. If you need major care they will provide transportation to a VA facility.

    TRICARE ( a conglomeration of military hospitals and civilians that provide care for active duty military ) is for active duty personal and their dependents although some retiree’s use it. Since those folks live around military bases and forts that’s where the facilities for TRICARE are found. There are not near as many as there are VA clinics and hospitals. Nor are they as densely scattered.

    If you’re a veteran in need of qualifying heath care and live a long distance from a base or fort you’d have to use the civilian pay option if the VA’s go. Since there are far less military posts than there are VA’s that would cause a burden on a lot of veterans and the tax payer.

    There is nothing wrong with the VA heath care. I left my left lung in a rice paddy 40 years ago, my left testicle in the forest 40 years ago and broke more bones than an anatomist can name in a helo crash but the VA has kept me around all this time. I never had “long waits” or bad care. It was always very good. This is another example of fixing something that’s not broken because the post fix version is what you want and saying that outright isn’t palatable.

  2. Avatar for vonq vonq says:

    I’m retired military on TRICARE and I pay for my insurance. The Fed govt may subsidize it, I haven’t researched that, but considering how cheap the insurance is, I’m sure it does, but it doesn’t pay for the entire program for retirees.

  3. The merger would be a shotgun wedding. Vets are older and sicker. Active duty soldiers are younger and healthier. They have different healthcare needs. It gets worse because of the differing missions of the VA and the DOD.

  4. Yup, my dad (who managed to stay a bit more intact than you during his service!) loved his VA care. The right’s been exploiting the problems that do exist to push their privatization fantasy in the one part of our health-care system that can literally be called socialized medicine, even though the folks who served our country – the folks the right is oh, so supportive of, and ready to use as sword and shield against any critic – overwhelmingly want it to remain as is, with the necessary fixes to the problem areas (which I understand has been happening). There’s literally no part of our lives today’s GOP isn’t hellbent on destroying in the name of lunatic Randian “freedom” – and in the service of their cartoonishly greedy donors.

  5. This is another back-door attempt to kill VA. Let’s not forget that the horrific Walter Reed Hospital scandal took place in a DoD facility, NOT a VAMC. Active-duty service members would love to get the kind of care veterans get from VA. You’d have a hard time finding a veteran who’d trade VA for private-contractor-infested DoD.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

5 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for vonq Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for gtomkins Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tsp Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for lisaaug

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: