Obama: US Will Send Help To Beleaguered Iraq

Iraqi men chant slogans against the al-Qaida breakaway group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), outside of the main army recruiting center to volunteer for military service in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, June.... Iraqi men chant slogans against the al-Qaida breakaway group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), outside of the main army recruiting center to volunteer for military service in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, June. 12, 2014, after authorities urged Iraqis to help battle insurgents. The al-Qaida-inspired group that led the charge in capturing two key Sunni-dominated cities in Iraq this week vowed on Thursday to march on to Baghdad, raising fears about the Shiite-led government's ability to slow the assault following the insurgents' lightning gains. (AP Photo/ Karim Kadim) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — Less than three years after pulling American forces out of Iraq, President Barack Obama is weighing a range of short-term military options, including airstrikes, to quell an al-Qaida inspired insurgency that has captured two Iraqi cities and threatened to press toward Baghdad.

“We do have a stake in making sure that these jihadists are not getting a permanent foothold,” Obama said Thursday in the Oval Office.

However, officials firmly ruled out putting American troops back on the ground in Iraq, which has faced resurgent violence since the U.S. military withdrew in late 2011. A sharp burst of violence this week led to the evacuation Thursday of Americans from a major air base in northern Iraq where the U.S. had been training security forces.

Obama, in his first comments on the deteriorating situation, said it was clear Iraq needed additional assistance from the U.S. and international community given the lightning gains by the militant group Islamic State of Iraq and Levant. Republican lawmakers pinned some of the blame for the escalating violence on Obama’s reluctance to re-engage in a conflict he long opposed.

For more than a year, the Iraqi government has been pleading with the U.S. for additional help to combat the insurgency, which has been fueled by the civil war in neighboring Syria. Northern Iraq has become a way station for insurgents who routinely travel between the two countries and are spreading the Syrian war’s violence.

Iraqi leaders made a fresh request earlier this week, asking for a mix of drones and manned aircraft that could be used for both surveillance and active missions. Officials said Obama was considering those requests and was expected to decide on a course of action within a few days.

The U.S. already is flying unmanned aircraft over Iraq for intelligence purposes, an official said.

Short of airstrikes, the president could step up the flow of military assistance to the beleaguered Iraqi government, increase training exercises for the country’s security forces and help boost Iraq’s intelligence capabilities. The U.S. has been leery of its lethal aid falling into the hands of militants or being otherwise misused.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the U.S. is sending about $12 million in humanitarian aid to help nearly a million Iraqis who have been forced from their homes by recent fighting.

Obama huddled with his national security team Thursday to discuss the deteriorating security situation. And Vice President Joe Biden called Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to underscore that while the U.S. stands ready to help, it would be crucial for Iraq to come up with longer-term solutions to its internal political strife.

Nearly all American troops left Iraq in December 2011 after Washington and Baghdad failed to negotiate a security agreement that would have kept a limited number of U.S. forces in the country for a few more years at least.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a frequent White House critic, called on Thursday for Obama’s entire national security team to resign. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, accused the president of “taking a nap” while conditions worsened.

But Congress appeared divided over how to respond, with some Republicans backing airstrikes and other lawmakers from both parties suggesting that was the wrong approach.

There were no calls for putting American troops back on the ground in Iraq, and Obama’s advisers said the president had no desire to plunge the U.S. back into a conflict there.

“The president is mindful that the United States has sacrificed a lot in Iraq and we need to not just be taking this all back on ourselves,” said Ben Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser. “We need to come up with solutions that can enable the Iraqis to manage their internal security and their internal politics.”

Even after American troops left Iraq, the U.S. has continued to send weapons and ammunition — although not nearly as much as Baghdad has requested. A U.S. training mission for Iraqi counterterror forces dwindled to almost nothing earlier this year, and Baghdad asked as early as last summer for armed U.S. drones to track and strike terrorist hideouts.

The administration resisted, and similarly rejected options for airstrikes in neighboring Syria.

Instead, the U.S. Embassy has sold small scout helicopters, tanks, guns, rockets and at least 300 Hellfire missiles to Iraqi forces. A U.S. shipment of ScanEagle surveillance drones is to be delivered to Iraq later this summer, and the State Department is trying to speed an order of Apache helicopters to Baghdad. Additionally, Congress is reviewing a $1 billion order of arms, including Humvee vehicles, to Iraq.

Several thousand Americans also remain in Iraq, mostly contractors who work at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad on programs to train Iraqi forces on American military equipment like fighter jets and tanks. One of the largest training missions was based at the air base in the city of Balad, about an hour northwest of Baghdad, where three planeloads of Americans were being evacuated on Thursday. They included 12 U.S. government officials and military personnel who have been training Iraqi forces to use fighter jets and surveillance drones.

___

Associated Press writers Robert Burns, Bradley Klapper and Donna Cassata contributed to this report.

___

Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC and Lara Jakes at http://twitter.com/larajakesAP

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. You mean that the Trillion Dollar War that cost Iraq hundreds of thousands of lives and millions of displaced persons was stupid, immoral and unwinnable. Chaney, Bush and Rumdumb, the greatest Republican minds of the time, got us into two Wars. These wars destroyed the minds and bodies and lives of tens of thousands (if not hundred of thousands) of active American soldiers. Can we learn a lesson here? Are we smart enough to cut the military budget for defense not empire building? When are we going to deal with our heating planet? How about our dying ocean? How about the American gun wars playing out on our streets? Political corruption run rampid on every level.

  2. I suspect we will turn our attention to our dying planet and ocean when they can no longer be ignored. We don’t care about the guns on the streets because those with influence don’t live there. Political corruption…well, the money is good, isn’t it, and let the rubes complain while we feed them partisan poison.

    Still…perhaps we should take a brief and temporary parallel trip along our self destructive course to help the Iraqis defend themselves from the worse kind of oppression humanity comes up with. It’s the least we can do, since the least is all we ever do to fix our messes.

  3. What’s wrong with letting the Iraqis settle this by themselves? And if they want a Caliphate let them have it.

  4. It’s been over 5 years since Bush left office. If we still, today, had 10% unemployment and a recession happening, would that be Bush’s fault? Technically, I suppose so, since he engineered the original recession. Realistically, no.

    I remember in 2004, a common shibboleth was, “whoever beats Bush in 2004 will get blamed for the coming disaster in Iraq.” Certainly, the illegal invasion of Iraq, the incompetent occupation, and all that flows from them, are his fault. But Bush did leave office over 5 years ago. If ISIS takes over Iraq, it will justifiably be considered Obama’s failure. Bush managed to limp to the end of his 2nd term without ‘losing’ Iraq. Hopefully, Obama will be able to match that achievement.

  5. They popped out of the Syrian dirt. They’re the guys McCain was screaming at Obama to send weapons to.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for luschnig Avatar for joan59 Avatar for longtom Avatar for pakilolo Avatar for errol44

Continue Discussion