WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic Party leaders are upping the pressure on Bernie Sanders to drop his presidential campaign, alarmed that his continued presence is undermining efforts to beat the presumptive Republican nominee, Donald Trump, and again win the White House.
“I don’t think they think of the downside of this,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a supporter of front-runner Hillary Clinton and broker of the post-primary peace between Clinton and then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama in 2008.
“It’s actually harmful because she can’t make that general-election pivot the way she should,” Feinstein said. “Trump has made that pivot.”
The new concerns come after Sanders’ recent wins over Clinton in Indiana and West Virginia. While those victories have provided his supporters a fresh sense of momentum heading into next week’s primaries in Kentucky and Oregon, they did almost nothing to help Sanders cut into Clinton’s nearly insurmountable lead in the delegates who will decide their party’s nomination.
Still Sanders soldiers on, frequently telling the thousands of supporters who attend his rallies that he still has a narrow path to the nomination.
“Please do not moan to me about Hillary Clinton’s problems,” Sanders said in a recent interview with MSNBC. “It is a steep hill to climb, but we’re going to fight for every last vote.”
Clinton, her aides and supporters have largely resisted calling on Sanders to drop out, noting that she fought her 2008 primary bid against Obama well into June. But now that Trump has locked up the Republican nomination, they fear the billionaire businessman is capitalizing on Sanders’ decision to remain in the race by echoing his attacks and trying to appeal to the same independent, economically frustrated voters that back the Vermont senator.
“I would just hope that he would understand that we need to begin consolidating our vote sooner rather than later,” said Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., a Clinton backer and former chief of efforts to elect Democrats to the House. “Democrats cannot wait too long.”
Though Clinton has for the past few weeks largely focused her rhetoric on Trump, campaign aides say the two-front effort hampers their ability to target both Sanders supporters and Republican-leaning independents that may be open to her candidacy. It also means she’s spending time in primary states, rather than battlegrounds that will decide the general election.
Clinton will return to Kentucky on Sunday, two days before the state’s primary. She’s sending high-level advocates to the state this weekend to rally voters, among them Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and Reps. James Clyburn of South Carolina, G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina, Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Hakeem Jeffries and Joe Crowley of New York.
While they can talk up Clinton, Sanders’ determination to contest every state remaining has kept Obama and Vice President Joe Biden largely on the sidelines, benching two of her most powerful advocates.
“It all sort of slows the takeoff of her general-election campaign,” said Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, a member of the party’s liberal wing from a perennial battleground.
Sanders’ campaign saw its fundraising drop by about 40 percent last month and he’s laid off hundreds of staffers. Biden said this week he “feels confident” that Clinton will be the nominee. Even Obama is pointing out the realities of the delegate math, which puts Clinton on track to capture the nomination early next month.
Clinton has won 23 states to Sanders’ 19, capturing 3 million more votes than her rival along the way. She has 94 percent of the delegates needed to win the nomination, which means she could lose all the remaining states and still emerge as the nominee — as long as all her supporters among the party insiders known as superdelegates continue to back her.
Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook wrote in a memo to donors this week that there is “no doubt” Clinton will be the Democratic nominee, describing her lead as “insurmountable.”
White House officials believe Obama has the ability to coax some die-hard Sanders’ fans into the Clinton camp, particularly young people and liberals. But if he moves before Clinton officially captures the nomination, he risks angering those voters and undermining that effort.
Clinton faces a similar calculus. While her international expertise could attract foreign policy-focused Republicans and suburban women, highlighting her record on those issues now might encourage Sanders to resurrect attacks on her vote in favor of the Iraq war.
“When his rhetoric takes a sharper tone against her, the hairs on the back of my neck stand up,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. “I know that can be used as ammunition.”
Clinton backers say there’s plenty for Sanders to do in his old job — and a lot of good reasons for him to join forces. If Democrats regain the majority in the Senate, he’d likely become chairman of the powerful Senate Budget Committee.
“We are looking forward to welcoming him back to the Senate,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.
Others note that Clinton has gone through this before and the party was able to unite after a tough primary in 2008.
“She knows this is a long process. It’s a marathon you run to the end,” said Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif. “On the Democratic side, we’re attacking issues, not each other.”
___
Follow Lisa Lerer and Ken Thomas on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/llerer and http://twitter.com/kthomasdc
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
““Please do not moan to me about Hillary Clinton’s problems,” Sanders said”
That’s it in a nutshell of what’s wrong with old berns. It’s all about him. He knows he’s lost, with no path to the nomination. At this point, I don’t think he cares if trump wins the WH.
Remember how jony mc behaved (and is still behaving) after losing. Sore loser narcissist. This guy is of the same temperament!
“…the same independent, economically frustrated voters that back the Vermont senator.”
Wonder if those are the same “independent” voters who send do-nothing jerks to Congress, or sit out midterms. If so, their furrowed brows in a vain attempt to understand why they are “economically frustrated” begins and ends with them.
Everyone please remember 2000.
There is NO meaningful difference between Bush and Gore we were told, over and over again. Tweedle dee, tweedle dum. Both are evil; why vote for the lesser of evils? etc, etc. Locally here in N California this was a mantra.
We know what happened. Catastrophe happened.
And we also know that the ‘no difference’ rhetoric was bullshit.
.
Must we endure this again?
I think all this silliness and, frankly, mendacity from the Sanders campaign will pass and won’t impact Clinton’s efforts in the fall much. It is just delaying things.
My fear is that Sanders is hurting his own goal of building a progressive movement in this country.
The dishonest effort to dismiss the voters’ will in primaries and caucuses by using super delegates to bypass the pledged delegates is creating incredible ill will. The constant attacks on Clinton’s character and not her policies (because the differences between the two are a matter of degree, not end goals) are building a wall between the Sandernistas and the Hillarybots.
If Sanders really wants to create a progressive wing of the Democratic Party, he is working directly against that goal by continuing the way he is going. His more leftist supporters won’t work with the party, and the moderate and conservative Democrats are disinclined to work with them.
Concern troll journalism from the AP has me very concerned.