Nadler: ‘They’ve Agreed’ To Have Mueller Testify Before Committee

WASHINGTON - APRIL 14: FBI Director Robert Mueller is sworn in April 14, 2004 during the second day of the 10th public hearing on the performance of law enforcement and the intelligence community prior to the Septem... WASHINGTON - APRIL 14: FBI Director Robert Mueller is sworn in April 14, 2004 during the second day of the 10th public hearing on the performance of law enforcement and the intelligence community prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Mueller defended the bureau's pre-Sept. 11 efforts on combating terrorism. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Special counsel Robert Mueller will testify before the House Judiciary Committee at a date to be decided, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) asserted Wednesday, Reuters first reported.

“This makes it even more important that Barr come in and testify before our committee tomorrow and that Mueller testify, which they’ve agreed to do, subject to setting a date, and we’ll see if they do that, sometime in May,” Nadler told reporters.

He was referring to a letter from Mueller to Attorney General Bill Barr on March 27, which was first reported Tuesday, in which Mueller told Barr that the March 24 letter the attorney general released a couple days after receiving Mueller’s final report “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions.”

Politito’s Kyle Cheney disputed Reuters’ initial reporting that anything was concretely agreed-to, saying Nadler was instead speaking more generally.

A spokesperson for the committee told TPM Wednesday afternoon that negotiations with the Department of Justice over a date were ongoing.

This post has been updated.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. in other words, there is no agreement for Mueller to testify, because there is no agreed upon date.

    But Jerry Nadler gets himself a headline, so all is good.

  2. First question is: did Barr or anyone else at the DOJ put restrictions on what you can say here today?

  3. Next question: were you pressured by anyone to conclude your investigation prematurely?

  4. Avatar for marby marby says:

    The questions need to be brief and direct, just like you’re suggesting. We’re already off the rails in the Barr testimony - long, convoluted introduction, lengthy question from Feinstein, and long Barr obfuscation. That just doesn’t get us anywhere.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

16 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for marby Avatar for becca656 Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for anon216902 Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for formerchild Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for judygran Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for stellermeller Avatar for maximus Avatar for matt_shuham Avatar for paul_lukasiak

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: