NYT: Campaign Tying Roy Moore To ‘Dry Alabama’ Social Media Was Run By Dems

MONTGOMERY, AL - DECEMBER 13: Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore speaks after loosing, during an election-night watch party at the RSA activity center in Montgomery, Ala. on Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2017. (Photo by ... MONTGOMERY, AL - DECEMBER 13: Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore speaks after loosing, during an election-night watch party at the RSA activity center in Montgomery, Ala. on Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2017. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Facebook and Twitter campaign for a “Dry Alabama,” that gained traction during the Alabama Senate race last year, appeared to have been run by religious supporters of then-candidate Roy Moore.

But, according to a new New York Times report, it was created and maintained by Democrats and other progressive activists who hoped tying Moore to efforts to invoke an alcohol ban across the state would hurt his standing with moderate Republicans.

It’s the second such example that the Times has uncovered in recent weeks that reveals deceptive tactics were used on social media to hurt Moore, who had also been accused at the time of molesting teenage girls when he was in his thirties and whose previous conduct as a judge had been called into question.

One of the creators of the “Dry Alabama” project, Matt Osborne, told the Times that he hopes one day the use of fake social media accounts in politics will be forbidden, but until then, Democrats have to keep up with Republicans who, he believes, are employing the same tactics.

“If you don’t do it, you’re fighting with one hand tied behind your back,” Osborne told the Times. “You have a moral imperative to do this — to do whatever it takes.”

Moore was defeated by Democrat Doug Jones, who became the first Democrat to represent the state in the Senate in a quarter century.

Latest News
40
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Wow. I must admit, I am torn on this one. I don’t think this should be done, But in these trumpian times, it’s hard to tell your team they must turn the other cheek.

  2. “If you don’t do it, you’re fighting with one hand tied behind your back,” Osborne told the Times. “You have a moral imperative to do this — to do whatever it takes.”

    You know he’s right. Until either the Rethugs quit (don’t hold your breath for this) using such strategies or it becomes illegal (get rid of dark money and Citizens United) you “fight fire with fire” for a level playing field.

    Same thing with gerrymandering. In your heart you know it’s wrong but until the SCOTUS says it’s illegal and you can do it? Then you do it. Force their hands or play their games. No hard choices here.

  3. No. Turnabout is NOT fair play. If we want to make things better and clean up after the Republicans’ mess, we cannot descend to their level. If Democrats want to be the party of truth, fair elections and honest government, then we have to BE that party.

    Shorter: Your mom was on target. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

  4. Sorry, old, but your mom was wrong. She didn’t see this coming.

  5. Nope. If we play the Republican game then we won’t make things better. Different, but not better.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

34 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for footballreddog Avatar for alcaray Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for globalguy Avatar for cervantes Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for bboerner Avatar for steveinmanhattan Avatar for georgemilquetoast Avatar for established_1781 Avatar for jtx Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for aiddon Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for alabamaken Avatar for docvanmojo Avatar for rogerhead

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: