North Korea Vows Harsh Retaliation Against New UN Sanctions

The fifteen members of the Securitity Council are seen raising their hands in favor of adopting new sanctions against North Korea during a meeting of the UN Security Council at UN Headquarters in New York, NY, USA on... The fifteen members of the Securitity Council are seen raising their hands in favor of adopting new sanctions against North Korea during a meeting of the UN Security Council at UN Headquarters in New York, NY, USA on August 5, 2017. The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting to consider new sanctions against North Korea following the nation's July 3 and July 28 tests of intercontinental ballistic missiles. At the meeting, the council adopted Resolution 2371 which imposes a full ban on North Korea's exportation of iron, coal, lead and all seafood products with the anticipated result of a nearly one-billion dollar impact on North Korea's economy. (Photo by Albin Lohr-Jones) *** Please Use Credit from Credit Field ***(Sipa via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korea vowed Monday to bolster its nuclear arsenal and launch “thousands-fold” revenge against the United States in response to tough U.N. sanctions imposed after its recent intercontinental ballistic missile launches.

The warning came two days after the U.N. Security Council unanimously approved new sanctions to punish North Korea, including a ban on coal and other exports worth over $1 billion. The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Nikki Haley, called the U.S.-drafted resolution “the single largest economic sanctions package ever leveled against” North Korea.

In a statement carried by state media, the North Korean government said the sanctions were a “violent infringement of its sovereignty” that was caused by a “heinous U.S. plot to isolate and stifle” North Korea.

It said the U.N. sanctions will never force the country to negotiate over its nuclear program or to give up its push to strengthen its nuclear capability as long as U.S. hostility and nuclear threats persist. The North said it will take an “action of justice,” but didn’t elaborate.

“It’s a wild idea to think the DPRK will be shaken and change its position due to this kind of new sanctions formulated by hostile forces,” said the statement, carried by the North’s official Korean Central News Agency. DPRK stands for the North’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

The North’s statement “rhetorically expresses its anger” against the U.N. sanctions, but the country is not likely to launch a direct provocation against the United States, said Lim Eul Chul, a North Korea expert at South Korea’s Kyungnam University. He said the North could still carry out new missile tests or a sixth atomic bomb test in the coming months under its broader weapons development timetable.

North Korea test-launched two ICBMs last month as part of its efforts to possess a long-range missile capable of striking anywhere in the mainland U.S. Both missiles were fired at highly lofted angles and analysts say the weapons could reach parts of the United States including Alaska, Los Angeles and Chicago if fired at a normal, flattened trajectory.

The centerpiece of the U.N. sanctions is a ban on North Korean exports of coal, iron, lead and seafood products — and a ban on all countries importing those products, estimated to be worth over $1 billion a year in hard currency. The resolution also bans countries from giving any additional permits to North Korean laborers, another source of foreign currency for the North, and prohibits all new joint ventures with North Korean companies.

According to a Security Council diplomat, coal has been North Korea’s largest export, earning $1.2 billion last year. It was then restricted by the Security Council in November to a maximum of $400 million. This year, Pyongyang is estimated to have earned $251 million from iron and iron ore exports, $113 million from lead and lead ore exports, and $295 million from fish and seafood exports, the diplomat said. The diplomat was not authorized to speak publicly and insisted on anonymity.

Analysts say that North Korea, already under numerous U.N. and other international sanctions, will feel some pains from the new U.N. sanctions but won’t likely return to disarmament negotiations anytime soon because of them.

Lim, the North Korea expert, said the North will likely squeeze its ordinary citizens to help finance its nuclear and missile programs. Shin Beomchul of the Seoul-based Korea National Diplomatic Academy said the North won’t likely return to disarmament talks unless there are sanctions that require China to stop sending its annual, mostly free shipment of 500,000 tons of crude oil to North Korea and order U.N. member states to deport the existing tens of thousands of North Korean workers dispatched abroad.

___

Associated Press writer Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for tao tao says:

    I have to wonder how much more the Norks can possibly squeeze their people and still keep some sort of worker production going. This lesson will not be wasted on the oligarch lampreys of the world.
    (Images if you care to look. )

  2. Russia opened up its border in the upper most NE area of N.K. allowing more weapons shipments to this pariah state just recently, and China will still continue to send them oil. There really is no level of sanction that will dissuade N.K. to turn away from their nuclear ambitions. So even though the vote was unanimous, it’ll be far from a workable solution. It just makes it look like China and Russia are on board, but basically doing very little to change the calculus. Not sure how this is a good thing, other than providing Russia and China cover to look good while basically continuing to support NK in the background.

    How are these sanctions verifiable is what I’d want to know? Who will be overseeing the enforcement mechanisms? Who is going to make sure both super-powers don’t purchase N. Korean exports? If this is on the honor system, I really don’t see this happening.

  3. We should undertake some form of limited military strike (take out a major command and control center, destroy a missile manufacturing facility, destroy a nuclear reactor, etc.) to show we are serious, and to call the midgets bluff. If that doesn’t work, or if an artillery attack on Seoul takes place, we should attack the DPRK with tactical nukes and destroy the country’s ability to function at any level.

  4. The NorthKo’s have maybe one or two wobbly ICBM’s that the US can in all likelihood could swat like flies.

    The USA has 4,500+/-.

    This is not a Mutually Assured Destruction scenario.

    This is North Korea being bombed back beyond the Stone Age, especially with our own lunatic-in-chief repeatedly hitting the launch button…

    Don’t think the NorKo’s fully grasp this…

  5. I think they’re counting on their ability to devastate South Korea for deterrence.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for tao Avatar for wagonmound Avatar for georgemilquetoast Avatar for maximus Avatar for 19tibekius6

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: