Judge Strikes Down Colorado Gay Marriage Ban, Stays Ruling

FILE- In this June 26, 2013 file photo, gay rights advocate Vin Testa waves a rainbow flag in front of the Supreme Court in Washington. On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a pair of landmark rulings, one ... FILE- In this June 26, 2013 file photo, gay rights advocate Vin Testa waves a rainbow flag in front of the Supreme Court in Washington. On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a pair of landmark rulings, one striking down a law that denied federal recognition to same-sex marriages and the other clearing the way for gay couples to wed legally in California. In the 12 months since the Supreme Court issued a pair of landmark rulings on same-sex marriage, the ripple effects of those rulings have transformed the national debate over marriage, prompting many people on both sides to conclude that its spread nationwide is inevitable. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) MORE LESS

DENVER (AP) — A federal judge in Denver has declared Colorado’s gay marriage ban unconstitutional, but he issued a temporary stay of the ruling until an appeals court hearing next month.

Judge Raymond P. Moore’s ruling Wednesday was in response to a lawsuit filed July 1 by six gay couples who asked the court for an injunction ordering that the state’s ban no longer be enforced.

Colorado Republican Attorney General John Suthers and Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper had requested a stay so the issue could eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court — though both agreed the state ban should be declared unconstitutional.

The couples filed the lawsuit after the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver ruled against Utah’s gay marriage ban but put the ruling on hold pending an appeal.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

9
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I’m shocked to say this, but the news isn’t quite as exciting as it would have been a year ago. What a difference a year makes. Still happy, but just not as excited.

  2. Didn’t another case there just decide the same thing?
    The whole point of the lawsuit was to stop the state from enforcing the ban so that couples in CO don’t have to wait through an entire year of appeals, and to that extent, it looks like the plaintiffs failed. They do go home with a nice consolation prize of having the ban re-declared unconstitutional.

  3. That was the State Supreme court. This is the Federal court

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for pac Avatar for leftflank Avatar for Sandman Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for antisachetdethe

Continue Discussion