California Seeks Moving Up 2020 Presidential Primary To Get More Sway

Calif., Gov. Jerry Brown answers a question concerning the budget agreement reached with legislative leaders at a Capitol news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Tuesday, June 16, 2015. Accompanied by Assembly Speaker... Calif., Gov. Jerry Brown answers a question concerning the budget agreement reached with legislative leaders at a Capitol news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Tuesday, June 16, 2015. Accompanied by Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, and Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, both unseen, Brown outlined the budget plan that send billions more to public schools and universities in the fiscal year that begins July 1. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation Wednesday to move up California’s 2020 presidential primary in a bid to give the nation’s most populous state more sway in choosing the Republican and Democratic nominees.

Holding an earlier primary in California, which is expensive to campaign in, could shake up the nominating contests by giving an earlier edge to candidates with more money. The state is home to 11 media markets.

The measure puts the state’s primary on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March, often known as “Super Tuesday,” when as many as a dozen states hold nominating contests. It will still fall after the earliest caucuses and primaries in Iowa and New Hampshire.

In 2016, California held its primary in June when Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump were already the major party nominees. California typically awards the most delegates.

The state moved its presidential primary to February in 2008, but the shift did not exert influence on the Democratic side. Clinton won the state’s primary, but Barack Obama went on to capture the party’s nomination.

The change also pushes California’s primary for state offices to March.

The Democratic and Republican national committees have not set rules for the 2020 contest yet. The parties set a calendar as well as how many delegates each state is awarded.

California received extra delegates for holding a late primary in 2016 and likewise could be punished in 2020 for moving up the election.

Latest News
3
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This is why the Sanders’ camp complaints of the DNC rigging the system were so ridiculous. If California, NY and NJ had their primaries in February last year like they did in 2008 when she lost the nomination she’d have walked away with it and Sanders would be a fading memory. The DNC could have pressured such states to move, but did not.

    The DNC had only four powers – 1) Passing out money; 2) Setting the delegate selection rules; 3) pressuring states to hold primaries/caucuses at certain times, but they can’t even force them to change; and 4) running the convention. Since the DNC passing out money is minor since Citizen’s United, the delegate selection process hadn’t been changed in a dozen years, the didn’t pressure any states to move their caucuses, and the convention organizing and platform committee was weighted to Sanders far in excess of his vote goals, the DNC did not put their thumb on the scale.

  2. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    Ohhhh now you’ve done it! You’ve poked a sharp stick at the DNC being unfair to Bernie myth.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for imkmu3

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: