Don Jr. Meeting Came At A Seminal Moment In Russian Interference Story

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump and his team are casting it as absurdly conspiratorial to suggest there was anything odd about his oldest son accepting a meeting with a Kremlin-linked lawyer last June, noting that Russia was not a major campaign issue at the time.

But a close look at the timeline suggests that Donald Trump, Jr. took a meeting billed as an opportunity to learn information obtained as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump” at a moment when his father was taking heat from his opponent for his sunny view of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and shortly before the Kremlin’s disinformation and targeted leaking campaign against the Democrats began in earnest.

“You have to understand, when that took place, this was before Russia fever,” Trump told Reuters on Wednesday. “There was no Russia fever back then, that was at the beginning of the campaign, more or less.”

Trump Jr. took a similar tack on Tuesday when he took the surprise step of releasing the email chain leading up to his June 2016 meeting with a woman described to him as a “Russian government lawyer” who was said to have “information that would incriminate Hillary” Clinton. “To put this in context, this occurred before the current Russian fever was in vogue,” Trump Jr. said in a statement accompanying the email release.

This version of events does not tell the whole story. The campaign had already been underway for a year, and the news was full of articles about Trump’s “bromance” with Putin prior to the Trump Tower meeting between Trump Jr., his brother-in-law Jared Kushner, then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, and lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin. Headlines declared that Putin had ordered state-owned U.S. media outlets like RT to promote Trump’s candidacy and tear down Clinton’s, and questions swirled about Trump advisers’ business connections in Russia.

On June 2, 2016 Clinton gave her first major speech on national security—in effect, a speech about Trump. The presumptive Democratic nominee repeatedly invoked Trump’s bond with Russia’s leader, accusing him of praising “dictators like Vladimir Putin” and having a “bizarre fascination with dictators and strongmen who have no love for America.”

“He said if he were grading Vladimir Putin as a leader, he’d give him an A,” Clinton told the San Diego, California crowd of Trump, warning that such an unsavvy stance would allow a leader like Putin to “eat your lunch.”

The very next day, Rob Goldstone, a British publicist and family friend of the Trumps, first contacted Trump Jr. about the “very interesting” information a client of his had on Clinton.

“If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer,” Trump Jr. replied to the promise for dirt in Clinton, days after his father had clinched the presidential nomination for the Republican Party.

While Goldstone and Trump Jr. worked out the details of the meeting in a series of back-and-forth emails, then-candidate Trump hinted at a June 7 campaign rally that he would soon give a “major speech” about Clinton.

“I am going to give a major speech on probably Monday of next week, and we’re going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons,” Trump said at the time, promising information on their “corrupt dealings” to give “favorable treatment” to “the Russians” and other foreign governments. “I think you’re going to find it very informative and very, very interesting.”

At the same time, the apparatus for publishing stolen emails and documents involving Democratic Party leaders and operatives—later determined to have been hacked by Russian operatives—was being put into place. On June 8, DC Leaks, a site established to publish some of the stolen documents, posted its first tweet.

The Trump Tower meeting between Trump Jr., the campaign associates and the Russians came on June 9; both sides have said it was inconsequential, with Trump Jr. insisting he did not receive the damaging information he came for and the Russian participants claiming the conversation focused only on a defunct program enabling the adoption of Russian children by Americans.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, a longtime Clinton critic, hinted in a June 12 interview that his site had a “very big year ahead,” promising the imminent release of emails “related to Hillary Clinton.”

Those emails wouldn’t drop until just before the Democratic National Convention in late July, but the public learned about the DNC breach at around this time via a June 14 Washington Post article that attributed it to hackers working on behalf of the Russian government. “Guccifer 2.0,” later determined by computer experts and U.S. officials to be a persona invented by Russian intelligence officials, began contacting U.S. news sites to claim credit for the hack and to offer stolen Democratic Party documents.

Putin praised Trump as a “bright” person at the Russian Economic Forum in St. Petersburg on June 17.

Amid this background and other major news events, Trump delayed his promised “major speech” on Clinton. After postponing it to account for the mass shooting at Pulse, a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, Trump promised in a June 21 tweet that a “big speech” about Clinton would come the next day.

From a stage in New York, Trump held forth about Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, her support for free trade and her “temperament.” None of these criticisms were new, but Trump added what would later seem a prescient warning: emails Clinton deleted from her private server could make her vulnerable to “blackmail” from countries hostile to the United States, he said.

As Trump cautioned, “We can’t hand over our government to someone whose deepest, darkest secrets may be in the hands of our enemies.”

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. I should have taken stock in the white board manufacturer while the price was low. How interesting to see part of the timeline of the events surrounding this meeting.
    Also how many tweeted promises has Dear Leader broken?

  2. Absolutely concur. And Trump was instantly manic about making the victim appear to be the perpetrator - sort of like he knew a certain deadly truth. Example: On June 15, 2016, right after Guccifer 2.0 begins posting material hacked from the DNC, Trump releases a statement accusing the DNC of being behind the hack “as a way to distract from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and failed party leader.”

    It’s not that that kind of bullshit isn’t typical of him. It’s that he was ready to launch his BS missile. There’s no pause for a “Wuh?” moment when something unexpected intrudes on his busy day. He knows what it’s all about already. His creepy buddy, Roger Stone, then becomes Guccifer’s blabbiest fan right off the bat and begins a bromance with Assange before Assange publishes anything useful to the campaign.

    At the same time, Trump had to have been picking up on the suspicions of establishment Republicans. There’s that wonderful transcript of Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan talking to other GOP leaders behind closed doors on June 21, 2016, with McCarthy saying, “I’ll guarantee you that’s what it is . . . The Russians hacked the DNC and got the opp [opposition] research they had on Trump.” Moments later he says, “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” referring to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, who we now know was a frequent meet-and-greeter of both Don Jr.'s Boris and Natasha visitors.

    Also interesting, by the second week of July, Trump’s lads are engineering their only change to the GOP platform - removing language calling for the U.S. to aid Ukraine.

    Christopher Steele’s sources had it right: He says early in July that Russian operatives have contacted Trump campaign associates with an offer to publish Clinton-related documents through Wikileaks, which would insulate the Trump campaign from culpability. These documents would arrive in exchange for a future Trump policy that tweaks the narrative on Russia’s Ukraine invasion. Part of this strategy would involve Trump publicly criticizing NATO regarding countries who don’t pay “their fair share.”

    We didn’t know about Steele’s dossier until 2017, but it predicted Trump’s action on the GOP platform and his year of yammering about NATO countries that don’t pay their fair share.

    It’s not collusion! It’s coincidental goalpost collision!

  3. Came? At a seminal moment?

    Sounds like more than a “meeting” to me …

  4. Reaction from Don and Eric. “You said seminal”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

136 more replies

Participants

Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for jep07 Avatar for trnc Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for zoester Avatar for mantan Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for gr Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for litho Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for tawwaba Avatar for katscherger Avatar for libthinker Avatar for edys Avatar for clare Avatar for pasque

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: