Wisconsin GOPers Want To Block Local Governments From Issuing Voter IDs

FILE - In this Sept. 9, 2010 file phoro, a lone voter takes part in early voting in Milwaukee. The Supreme Court deals with churning election rules in several states less than a month from November's voting, blockin... FILE - In this Sept. 9, 2010 file phoro, a lone voter takes part in early voting in Milwaukee. The Supreme Court deals with churning election rules in several states less than a month from November's voting, blocking voter ID laws in Wisconsin while siding with Republicans for stricter rules in North Carolina and Ohio. In Texas, a federal court strikes down a voter ID law, but the state may still appeal that ruling. (AP Photo/Morry Gash) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Wisconsin Republicans are pushing state legislation that would block local governments from issuing voter ID cards — which are required at the ballot box under a 2011 law — even though the locals IDs currently being considered in a Milwaukee program aren’t meant to be used for voting.

Republican state Sen. Van Wanggaard and state Rep. Joe Sanfelippo are floating a proposal that would ​bar towns and counties from issuing photo ID cards to the public,​ according to the Journal Sentinel, ​while placing restrictions on the IDs issued by cities and villages.​ It also would require that any ID issued by local governments to state clearly that it does not meet the state’s voter ID requirements.

The memo being circulated claims that the legislation would prevent fraud, and that local IDs would be “potentially misleading, confusing, and unfair to the card’s recipient” who would believe he or she qualified for public benefits.

The legislation appears to be a direct response to a program in the works in the Milwaukee area that would fund the issuance of a photo ID for residents to use when seeking health care, obtaining library cards and setting up bank accounts. The local IDs are meant for Milwaukee’s immigrant and homeless populations, as well as victims of domestic violence, runaway youths and transgender people who also face obstacles obtaining state IDs.

The local IDs, which were included as amendment in the county’s 2016 budget, would not be usable for voting or for receiving public benefits, supporters of the ID said.

“While it’s regrettable that Republicans deny marginalized people food and health care, they also know that Milwaukee IDs will not prove eligibility for safety net programs either — don’t worry, they’ll still be hungry,” Christine Neumann-Ortiz, executive director of Voces de la Frontera, told the Journal Sentinel. “The Milwaukee ID program is a great example of a local government responding to grass-roots voices and stepping in to provide basic services to constituents when the state and federal government have failed to do so.”

Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly said that the legislation banned cities and villages from issuing photo IDs. The legislation prohibits counties and towns from issuing photo IDs.

Latest Livewire
63
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The Constitution clearly states that only Expensive State Issued Photo IDs can be used as proof of voting eligibility. Look it up!!

  2. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    Are these people under some kind of a curse that requires them to do a new stupidly evil act every day? Because this one is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

  3. WI included local photo IDs in their 2016 budget for Pete’s sake. How dumb do you have to be to not know the difference between a local city ID and a State issued ID? Essentially, Republicans in WI are still trying to solve a problem that simply does not exist…namely voter fraud. Honestly, if MI (where I hail from) and WI switched Governors and their legislatures, no one would notice the difference. They’re both that bad at what they do. They’re both corrupt, and they both waste endless amounts of time making laws that have no benefit to anyone in either State but themselves and their fucking campaign donors.

  4. Sooner or later poor people, immigrants, the aged, college students, gays, blacks, women, atheists and academics will finally realize they suck and The Founding Fathers (insert Hallelujah Chorus here) had NO INTENTION that they meddle in the affairs of this nation. OR GET FRICKING STUFF FOR FREE!!! GRRR!!!

  5. More of that “local control” that GOP politicians crave so badly.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

57 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for gothamer Avatar for nickdanger Avatar for sysprog Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for nellieh Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for turtles_run Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for mike2 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for totentanz Avatar for robertearle Avatar for zuch Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for artmofo Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for zd123 Avatar for beattycat Avatar for canary02 Avatar for castor_troy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: