Christie’s ‘High School’ Attack On Wildstein Has One Big Flaw

David Wildstein takes an oath during a hearing Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, at the Statehouse in Trenton. Wildstein, a former appointee of Gov. Chris Christie is refusing to answer questions from a legislative committee ... David Wildstein takes an oath during a hearing Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, at the Statehouse in Trenton. Wildstein, a former appointee of Gov. Chris Christie is refusing to answer questions from a legislative committee looking into a scandal involving punitive traffic lane closures. The Christie administration stands accused of closing lanes on the George Washington Bridge, linking New York and New Jersey, in order to create a huge traffic backup as retribution against a local mayor for not endorsing the governor’s reelection. (AP Photo/Mel Evans) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An article published Tuesday by The Bergen Record called into question the accuracy of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s (R) attack against the character of former Port Authority of New York and New Jersey executive David Wildstein.

Christie’s office came out swinging at Wildstein on Saturday, following the release of a letter from Wildstein’s lawyer alleging that Christie knew about the George Washington Bridge lane closures while they were happening. In a response memo reportedly sent to friends and supporters, Christie’s office offered “5 Things You Should Know About The Bombshell That’s Not A Bombshell.” Among the accusations Christie’s office leveled against Wildstein: that he “was publicly accused by his high school social studies teach of deceptive behavior.”

But the story apparently didn’t end there. According to the Record, it ended with Wildstein and the teacher agreeing that there had been merely a “misunderstanding.”

The incident occurred in 1979, when Wildstein was a high school student and running for a seat on the Livingston, N.J. school board. Wildstein asked a teacher, Albert Adler, to sign a piece of paper — which turned out to be a letter endorsing Wildstein’s candidacy. The letter later appeared in a local weekly newspaper under Adler’s name, and Adler then told the newspaper that he did not write the letter. He even issued a statement suggesting that he had been the victim of “political manipulation.”

But a few days later, Wildstein and Adler patched things up. According to the Record, they issued a joint statement to the weekly newspaper on April 10, 1979, saying the episode had been “an honest difference of opinion” and “basically a misunderstanding.”

Latest Livewire
1
Show Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: