White House: There Isn’t ‘Any Way Back’ For Bannon After Trump Jr. Criticism

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 9: Steve Bannon, advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump, walks on the South Lawn after arriving the White House in April 9, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Olivier Douliery-Pool/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The White House on Monday made it clear: President Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon is in Trump’s bad books for good, after criticizing his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., for meeting with a Russian lawyer in June 2016.

“I don’t believe there is any way back for Mr. Bannon at this point,” deputy White House press secretary J. Hogan Gidley told reporters aboard Air Force One, according to a pool report. “I just don’t think there’s any way back.”

Gidley called Bannon’s remarks “repugnant” and “grotesque,” and claimed it was “very obvious” he worked with Michael Wolff, the author of “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” where Wolff first reported Bannon’s comments.

“When you go after somebody’s family in the matter which he did, two of the President’s children are serving this nation, sacrificing in their service, it is repugnant,” Gidley said. “It is grotesque and I challenge anybody to go and talk about somebody’s family and see if that person doesn’t come back and comes back hard.”

Bannon on Sunday said his remarks calling Trump Jr.’s meeting with the Russian lawyer “treasonous” and “unpatriotic” were actually directed at Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair.

He did not apologize to Trump Jr., but said he has “regret” regarding his two-day delay in responding to initial reports on his remarks.

On Monday, Wolff pushed back on Bannon’s denial.

“I don’t want to put him in more hot water than he is already in, but that statement is false,” Wolff said. “It was not directed at Manafort. It was directed directly at Don Jr.”

Read an editor’s backgrounder (Prime access) on this story »

 

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. It is grotesque and I challenge anybody to go and talk about somebody’s family and see if that person doesn’t come back and comes back hard

    So basically a straight up threat from the President. Nice.

  2. “When you go after somebody’s family in the matter which he did, two of the President’s children are serving this nation, sacrificing in their service, it is repugnant.”

    Sacrificing? More like grifting.

    ROTFL

  3. “Bitter, party of one, your table is ready!”

  4. Avatar for ggus ggus says:

    Boo effing hoo.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

136 more replies

Participants

Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for jackster Avatar for sconosciuto Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for irasdad Avatar for inversion Avatar for joelopines Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for tena Avatar for junebug Avatar for clauscph Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for demyankee Avatar for rickjones Avatar for katscherger Avatar for atldrew

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: