White House: Trump Opposes Senate Deal To Stabilize Obamacare

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders speaks to the media during the daily briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House, Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders speaks to the media during the daily briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House, Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Alice Ollstein contributed reporting from Washington, D.C.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Wednesday that President Donald Trump does not support a bipartisan deal to stabilize Obamacare’s individual market, reversing the White House’s stance once again.

But as Sanders was laying out the White House’s position, one of the co-authors of the deal insisted to reporters on the Hill that Trump was not opposed to it.

The deal, championed by Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Patty Murray (D-WA), would fund Obamacare’s cost-sharing reductions (CSRs) for two years. Trump recently refused to authorize the payments to insurance companies, which are used to lower the cost of insurance for low- and middle-income people purchasing insurance on Obamacare’s individual market.

The deal would also restore funding for Obamacare outreach, in addition to making concessions to conservatives like waiving some regulations and making skimpier plans available on the individual market.

“Is it correct then to say that President Trump does not support this deal in its current form?” a reporter asked Sanders Wednesday.

“Correct,” she said.

But earlier in the press briefing Wednesday, Sanders called the deal “a good step.”

“We want something that doesn’t just bail out the insurance companies but actually provides relief for all Americans,” she said. “And this bill doesn’t address that fact so we want to make sure that that’s taken care of.”

“We think this is a step — a good step in the right direction,” she continued. “This President certainly supports Republicans and Democrats coming to work together, but it’s not a full approach and we need something to go a little bit further to get on board.”

One reporter asked her to be more specific.

“Some of the things that the President has stated before,” she replied. “He wants to lower premiums, he wants to provide greater flexibility, he wants to drive competition. He likes the idea of block grants to states. Those are a lot of the the ideas that he’d like to see in a health care plan.”

Trump himself has come out on both sides of the deal. After refusing to pay for CSRs, throwing insurance markets into a panic, he called Alexander and Murray’s deal to re-fund them “a very good solution” during a joint press conference with the Greek prime minister Tuesday.

On Wednesday, he reversed course again.

But, speaking to reporters as Sanders said Trump didn’t support the current deal, Alexander said that “no,” he didn’t interpret Trump’s tweet Wednesday morning as his coming out against the bill.

“The President literally called me a week ago Saturday and asked me to do this,” he said. “And then we talked again last Saturday about it, and then he called me again this morning. He’s made all those calls.”

“I don’t expect him to support an agreement he hasn’t read,” he continued, adding: “All this is, is a proposal by Sen. Murray and me that we think makes sense for the American people.”

This post has been updated.

Latest Livewire
36
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Translation: Trump doesn’t care one bit about your health care.

  2. He is going to fuck this up.

  3. If we were dealing with a rational President, what Sanders said makes perfect sense. The deal is a start. We want to see them move forward. A normal President would then engage in the process behind closed doors.

    Our current President doesn’t know how to negotiate or to lead. He isn’t rational. He isn’t normal in any way. He just wants to muddy the waters and hope the parties will pull something out of the air.

  4. GOOD. I want this fucked up. It’s time for consequences or nobody will learn anything at all. I’ve fucking had it with the Dems bailing the GOP out time and time and time again.

  5. Someone needs to call his bluff by introducing legislation that bypasses health insurers entirely.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

30 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for blandsten Avatar for wwss Avatar for sniffit Avatar for johnrm Avatar for boidster Avatar for denisj Avatar for kunk24 Avatar for esva Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for katscherger Avatar for socalista Avatar for thinski Avatar for maximus Avatar for drtv Avatar for moniker

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: