Fact Checker: McConnell’s New Obamacare Claim ‘Not Credible’

With his wife Elaine Chao, left, looking on, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell addresses his supporters following his victory in the republican primary, Tuesday, May 20, 2014, at the Mariott Louisville East in Louisvi... With his wife Elaine Chao, left, looking on, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell addresses his supporters following his victory in the republican primary, Tuesday, May 20, 2014, at the Mariott Louisville East in Louisville, Ky. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler, who writes the paper’s Fact Checker blog, is calling out Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for his puzzling argument that Obamacare should be repealed while Kentucky’s state-based Obamacare exchange, Kynect, should remain intact.

Since McConnell made the claim he’s been inundated with criticism from Democrats as well as one of Kentucky’s largest newspapers. Kessler followed up to earlier statements released by the McConnell campaign about his comments with McConnell campaign manager Jesse Benton.

“Medicaid existed before Obamacare and will continue to exist after repeal. Kynect is not Medicaid,” Benton said in one of the emails he exchanged with Kessler. “It is a state administered exchange that provides a marketplace for private insurance plans. While some 300,000 Kentuckians discovered they were eligible for Medicaid through Kynect, they do not purchase private insurance through the exchange; they are enrolled in the state-administered program.”

Benton’s explanations don’t add up, writes Kessler. The Medicaid expansion in Kentucky and other states is funded through the federal government as prescribed by Obamacare. In the conclusion to his post, Kessler wrote that ” is not credible for McConnell to suggest that the state exchange would survive without the broad health-care system constructed by the Affordable Care Act, such as an individual mandate and subsidies to buy insurance.”

“Given the popularity of the state exchange, McConnell appears to want to offer out hope it would continue even in the unlikely case the law was actually repealed,” Kessler wrote “That’s likely not a tenable position, and we will pay close attention to McConnell’s phrasing on this issue in the future. The senator is clearly trying to straddle a political fence; when doing so, it’s easy to lose your balance.”

(H/t: Greg Sargent)

This post has been updated.

Latest Livewire
23
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Sure, any state could have put in exchanges and mandates and provided subsidies on its own as Massachusetts did with Romneycare. Is Mitch now urging Kentucky Republicans to do that? Is he?

  2. “Not Credible”

    I’m gonna enter that into the understatement of the year award running. That’s like saying oh, golly gee…after rigorous research, the moon isn’t actually made of green cheese.

  3. But Kessler doesn’t award any of his Pinnochios to McConnell’s false claims.

  4. McConnell doesn’t give a s**t about his credibility, facts, or the truth. He’s got an election to win after all, and that is all that is important to him. The consequences of his election and how they affect his constituents don’t factor into his thinking at all. Well, I guess he does care how they affect the rich ones.

  5. Occam whips out the Razor, and determines that the simplest explanation is the correct one:

    McConnell is just a craven, lying filthy piece of shit.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for mt_from_cc Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for druid800 Avatar for mapleleaflover Avatar for dv01 Avatar for radicalcentrist Avatar for lew Avatar for sergeant2 Avatar for truegrits Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for mcbain Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for mjshep Avatar for snarkus_aurelius Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for jimgroom Avatar for dddinah Avatar for chicago11

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: