The Speaker of Virginia’s House of Delegates, Republican Bill Howell, said he was “stunned” that Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) had used an executive action to restore the voting rights of more than 200,000 felons. In a statement issued Friday, Howell accused McAuliffe of granting the felons the right to vote so he could help Hillary Clinton get elected.
“The singular purpose of Terry McAuliffe’s governorship is to elect Hillary Clinton President of the United States,” Howell said. “This office has always been a stepping stone to a job in Hillary Clinton’s cabinet.”
Howell said McAuliffe’s executive order ran counter to past governors’ directives, which restored felons civil rights on a case by case basis. He said McAuliffe’s motives in issuing the blanket order were “transparent.”
“I am not surprised by the lengths to which he is willing to go to deliver Virginia to Hillary Clinton in November,” Howell said.
Howell is not the first Republican to imply that felons would lean Democrat. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said in December that “the overwhelming majority of violent criminals are Democrats.”
In his state Friday, Howell also accused McAuliffe of “undermining the strength of the criminal justice system and the sanctity of our civil rights.”
Howell added that his office was reviewing the governor’s order “to determine what options are available to the General Assembly.”
Read the full statement below:
“I am stunned yet not at all surprised by the Governor’s action. I am stunned at his broad and unprecedented view of executive power, which directly contradicts how past Governors have interpreted their clemency powers, and I am stunned at his willingness to restore the rights of the most heinous criminals without batting an eye. Yet, I am not surprised by the lengths to which he is willing to go to deliver Virginia to Hillary Clinton in November.
“There are significant constitutional and legal questions regarding the Governor’s authority to take such drastic action. No Governor in the history of Virginia has accepted such a sweeping view of executive power. A.E. Dick Howard notes in his commentaries that Governors have considered the “restoration of civil disabilities on an individual basis.” The Supreme Court has acknowledged the Governor’s authority on the restoration of rights, but only in the context of requests made by individuals. The Court does not appear to have ever contemplated the view taken by the Governor. Most recently, in 2010, counsel to Governor Tim Kaine said ‘a blanket order restoring the voting rights of everyone would be a rewrite of the law rather than a contemplated use of the executive clemency powers.’
“It is hard to describe how transparent the Governor’s motives are. The singular purpose of Terry McAuliffe’s governorship is to elect Hillary Clinton President of the United States. This office has always been a stepping stone to a job in Hillary Clinton’s cabinet. The one-time nature of this action is proof positive of the Governor’s political motivations. Instead of adopting a clear policy that can be applied equitably, he is changing the rules in the middle of the 2016 election to ensure Hillary Clinton’s victory.
“When convicted felons have completed their sentence and paid their debt to society, they deserve the opportunity to demonstrate they once again deserve their civil rights. However, there should be a clear, consistent, and delineated policy that applies fairly and equitably. That policy should take into account the nature of the crimes committed, whether they have paid back their victims and the court system, and their willingness to serve as productive members of society.
“The Governor’s policy applies to criminals who have committed even the most heinous violent crimes including murder, rape, child rape, and kidnapping. Under this Governor’s policy, violent criminals will be treated the same as lifelong law-abiding citizens. Not only will these criminals have the right to vote, but they will also be serving on our juries. By using no discretion in this process, the Governor is undermining the strength of the criminal justice system and the sanctity of our civil rights.
“We will immediately begin a detailed review of the Governor’s policy to determine what options are available to the General Assembly.”
Howell is the most despicable person in Virginia government. On many levels. But this is beyond the pale. Why? Because GOPers have done the exact same thing! Funny how he ignores that. Now watch as the media simply regurgitates this story without saying the GOP does it too. Media: “Nothing beats bashing Democrats and shilling for the GOP!”
This is truly disgusting even for Howell. He is truly a horrible person.
I am happy that McAuliffe did this. Sometimes the right thing to do is that way because more than one thing gets right.
I agree. We should totally remove tax exempt status from churches.
I think there is a very small fair criticism to this. Making it a blanket decree does take away a tiny bit of leverage that Wardens, etc have because their in-prison behavior is no longer considered. Not sure this is possible, but I would have rather seen a change where rights are restored with a simple application on release and an assumption they would be granted automatically unless flagged. Same net result, but more control.
Instead of “All Dems are felons”, if politicians came out with fair and reasonable critiques, people might actually listen and respect the opinions.
I could support that. You’re right – pretty much everyone who wants them gets those rights restored … unless flagged by a warden or counselor, etc., and then a review kicks in.