READ: UVA Frat Rebuts Rolling Stone’s Gang Rape Story

Members of the audience hold signs during a board of visitors meeting about sexual assault at the University of Virginia on Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2014 in Charlottsville, Va. The meeting comes after Rolling Stone publishe... Members of the audience hold signs during a board of visitors meeting about sexual assault at the University of Virginia on Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2014 in Charlottsville, Va. The meeting comes after Rolling Stone published an article describing a woman's account of a brutal gang rape, and what the magazine called a hidden culture of sexual violence at the school. (AP Photo/The Daily Progress, Ryan M. Kelly) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The University of Virginia fraternity where a horrific gang rape described in a recent Rolling Stone article allegedly took place issued a statement Friday rebutting several details of that story.

“We continue to be shocked by the allegations and saddened by this story. We have no knowledge of these alleged acts being committed at our house or by our members,” UVA’s chapter of Phi Kappa Psi said in a statement. “Anyone who commits any form of sexual assault, wherever or whenever, should be identified and brought to justice.”

The organization said that it had worked with the Charlottesville, Va. Police Department to investigate the claims detailed in the Rolling Stone article, but said that its “initial doubts as to the accuracy of the article have only been strengthened as alumni and undergraduate members have delved deeper.”

These are the details of the alleged victim’s account, as reported by Rolling Stone, that the fraternity specifically disputes:

  • There was no Phi Kappa Psi brother listed as a lifeguard at the university’s Aquatic and Fitness Center in 2012;
  • The fraternity did not hold a social event during the weekend of Sept. 28, 2012;
  • The fraternity’s pledging activities take place in the spring and not the fall semester.

Rolling Stone’s managing editor, Will Dana, published an editor’s note earlier Friday that stated the magazine “misplaced” its trust in the victim, Jackie, as discrepancies had arisen in her account of the alleged rape.

Read the full statement below:

Phi Kappa Psi Statement on Rolling Stone Article

Latest Livewire
19
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    And what will get all the press? The possibility that the event didn’t happened. The pond scum masquerading as broadcast media will happily ignore the horrific number of rapes nationwide. There were 188,000 in 2010. That’s 1 ever 2 minutes. But lets focus on this one instance and ignore the rest. It’s rather like the gun fetishists ignoring gun violence statistics.

  2. There was no Phi Kappa Psi brother listed as a lifeguard at the university’s Aquatic and Fitness Center in 2012;

    The fraternity did not hold a social event during the weekend of Sept. 28, 2012;

    The fraternity’s pledging activities take place in the spring and not the fall semester.

    That’s it? Those are the “discrepancies” dug up by “alumni and students” that are supposed to disprove the whole story?

  3. Having to post comment from this venue rather than from the story makes die a little bit on the inside with every new article.

  4. “The fraternity did not hold a social event during the weekend of Sept. 28, 2012”

    At least not any event that their lawyer said they the had to list as social events. I’m pretty sure most of the frat event that I went to during college were not listed as “Social events.”

  5. Dev and Design can spin a better story than the UX people any day and that is because Dev and Design lie

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

13 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for scalfin Avatar for skippyflipjack Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for atomicfern Avatar for mybeautifulmind Avatar for mtward

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: