President-elect Donald Trump had a meeting Tuesday with the New York Times that was very publicly on, then off, then on again. Times reporter Maggie Haberman live-tweeted the meeting and a breakdown of their conversation via her tweets is below:
Latest
2 days ago
Violent or Nonviolent? January 6ers Try to Parse Trump Pardon Remarks
3 days ago
Georgia Appeals Court Disqualifies Fani Willis From Trump RICO Case
4 days ago
How a Decades-Old Loophole Lets Billionaires Avoid Medicare Taxes
5 days ago
MAGA Republicans Dodge Questions About Their Own Party’s Plans To Gut Social Safety Net
Latest Livewire
-
|August 19, 2019 3:20 p.m.
Planned Parenthood is leaving the federal government’s Title X program, which funds family planning services for low-income people, due to…
-
|April 8, 2019 4:36 p.m.
Following the ousters of the Homeland Security secretary and Secret Service director, and the withdrawal of the would-be ICE director’s…
-
|April 8, 2019 3:47 p.m.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Monday called for ousted Secret Service Director Randolph “Tex” Alles to testify before…
-
|April 8, 2019 12:21 p.m.
Nielsen: "I just want to thank the President, again." pic.twitter.com/5m8WSU9Xej — TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) April 8, 2019
Masthead
Masthead
Reporting facts = unfair. Where have heard that before…
With reality having a liberal bias, I have a sense of deja vu before the Trump presidency even started. What a total clustertrump.
“The law’s totally on my side, the president can’t have a conflict of interest.”
What does that mean?
In actual practice, I clearly can’t do either one.
So, Trump says stuff and Maggie acts as stenographer. Fascinating. But why should anyone believe anything he says? Oh, but he’s the PEOTUS!, you say. And, your point is?
There’s no conflict of interest. I’m interested in both.