President-elect Donald Trump had a meeting Tuesday with the New York Times that was very publicly on, then off, then on again. Times reporter Maggie Haberman live-tweeted the meeting and a breakdown of their conversation via her tweets is below:
Latest
17 hours ago
House Ethics Republicans Vote To Bury Gaetz Report As Senate Gears Up For ‘Kavanaugh On Steroids’
17 hours ago
Inside The Frenzy Among Jan. 6 Plotters To Snag A Trump Pardon
2 days ago
Bragg Signals He Wants To Keep Hush Money Case Alive Until Trump Leaves Office
2 days ago
Kari Lake Quietly Settles Defamation Lawsuit And Accepts Defeat In Wake Of Trump Win
Latest Livewire
-
|August 19, 2019 3:20 p.m.
Planned Parenthood is leaving the federal government’s Title X program, which funds family planning services for low-income people, due to…
-
|April 8, 2019 4:36 p.m.
Following the ousters of the Homeland Security secretary and Secret Service director, and the withdrawal of the would-be ICE director’s…
-
|April 8, 2019 3:47 p.m.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Monday called for ousted Secret Service Director Randolph “Tex” Alles to testify before…
-
|April 8, 2019 12:21 p.m.
Nielsen: "I just want to thank the President, again." pic.twitter.com/5m8WSU9Xej — TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) April 8, 2019
Comments
Continue Discussion
Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com
64 more replies
Masthead
Masthead
Reporting facts = unfair. Where have heard that before…
With reality having a liberal bias, I have a sense of deja vu before the Trump presidency even started. What a total clustertrump.
“The law’s totally on my side, the president can’t have a conflict of interest.”
What does that mean?
In actual practice, I clearly can’t do either one.
So, Trump says stuff and Maggie acts as stenographer. Fascinating. But why should anyone believe anything he says? Oh, but he’s the PEOTUS!, you say. And, your point is?
There’s no conflict of interest. I’m interested in both.