WaPo: Trump Team Planned Call With President Of Taiwan For Weeks

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally, Friday, Nov. 4, 2016, in Atkinson, N.H. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Donald Trump’s advisers spent weeks planning an unprecedented call between the President-elect and the president of Taiwan as part of a new strategy toward Taiwan, the Washington Post reported Sunday.

Per the Post:

The historic communication — the first between leaders of the United States and Taiwan since 1979 — was the product of months of quiet preparations and deliberations among Trump’s advisers about a new strategy for engagement with Taiwan that began even before he became the Republican presidential nominee, according to people involved in or briefed on the talks.

Stephen Yates, a former national security official for President George W. Bush who helped change language regarding China in the 2016 Republican Party platform, told the Washington Post that Taiwan’s president was on the list of officials for Trump to call “very early on.”

“Once the call was scheduled, I was told that there was a briefing for President-elect Trump. They knew that there would be reaction and potential blowback.” Yates said.

Trump’s call with the president of Taiwan marked the first call between leaders of the two countries since 1979. The call prompted China to issue a warning to Trump.

“It must be pointed out that there is only one China in the world,” the Chinese foreign ministry said in a Saturday statement directed at Trump. “We urge the relevant side in the U.S. to adhere to the ‘one China’ policy, abide by the pledges in the three joint China-U.S. communiques, and handle issues related to Taiwan carefully and properly to avoid causing unnecessary interference to the overall China-U.S. relationship.”

Trump defended the call on Twitter by claiming that the president of Taiwan called him. He then fired back at China on Sunday.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. IOW’s he really doesn’t give a flying fuck.

    Just business folks.

  2. In other words, they have figured out an ad hoc lie that can’t be proven to be not true that sounds slightly plausible… except for the flurry of “what the fuck is he doing!!!” From everyone who you’d think would be in on this from the government and the fact that we know he spent that call talking about his businesses, not the nation’s

  3. Read the way people who understand our economic and military relationship with China are reacting. They’re freaking out. This maniac could get us all killed. If we’re lucky we’ll have a decline in wealth and influence that could last decades.

    Becoming actually dangerous.
    Chinese could write off TW call as ignoramus blunder. Now he’s digging in.
    (& CN now holding curr UP, not down) https://t.co/b7BkaoktMT

    — James Fallows (@JamesFallows) December 4, 2016
  4. So, Trump must’ve been pretty confident on winning a “rigged” election weeks ago when he was way behind in the polls.

  5. On the one hand, the Trump leadership corporation (TLC) takes a strong position in favor of democracy in China, while at the same time sending lots of TLC to the butcher of Amman and new Stalin in Moscow.
    Look, Trump has put a lot of Onion writers out of work. Some of them are actually pretty well-informed about world events. How about hiring some of those guys, to bring some sanity?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

62 more replies

Participants

Avatar for george_c Avatar for dbhuff Avatar for charliee Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for hoppy Avatar for sysprog Avatar for djnoll Avatar for dweb Avatar for theod Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for hjs62 Avatar for lillithmc Avatar for phac3ti0us Avatar for pandastirfry Avatar for clauscph Avatar for hawiken Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for jonnygee Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for jadez

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: