HHS Secretary On Premium Hikes For The Older: ‘Somebody’s Going To Pay’

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 24: Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., nominee for Health and Human Services secretary, testifies at his Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen Building, January 24, 2017. Chairman Orrin... UNITED STATES - JANUARY 24: Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., nominee for Health and Human Services secretary, testifies at his Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen Building, January 24, 2017. Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, appears at left. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The secretary of Health and Human Services dismissed concerns about older, sicker people paying much more for health insurance under Republicans’ plan on Friday, saying “somebody’s going to pay for health coverage for the American people, and the question is how do you do that.”

In an interview with “Fox & Friends,” HHS Secretary Tom Price was asked about part of Republicans’ bill that widens the possible ratio of premium prices between young and old people from 3:1 to 5:1, allowing insurers to charge older people more.

“That’s going in the wrong direction,” Steve Doocy said.

“Well, it’s pricing for what individuals’ health status is, and that’s important to appreciate,” Price said. “Somebody’s going to pay for health coverage for the American people, and the question is how do you do that. And right now, what we’re seeing is that the current plan doesn’t work, because you’ve got 20 million individuals out there who’ve said, ‘Nonsense, I’m not even going to participate in this process.’”

Price was referring to individuals who opted not to buy insurance under Obamacare, either paying a fee or claiming a “hardship exemption.”

Pressed on whether the government would provide assistance for “people who are going to end up paying five times more,” Price said individuals would “absolutely” receive help, “depending on where you are in the economic spectrum.”

However, the Congressional Budget Office found in March (pp. 34) that Republicans’ proposed tax credits for individuals in the nongroup health insurance market were much less generous than Obamacare’s subsidies.

Earlier in the interview, Price acknowledged that House Republicans chose not to wait for a new CBO analysis of amendments offered by Reps. Mark Meadows (R-NC), Tom MacArthur (R-NJ) and Fred Upton (R-MI).

“The score has been made by CBO,” he said. “And everybody understands that the Congressional Budget Office is just looking at a narrow sliver of this entire plan.”

He was referring to the planned “phases” of Republicans’ health care effort, separate from the American Health Care Act — a massive deregulatory effort undertaken by HHS, and the potential passage of several other measures that are unlikely to receive many Democratic votes, if at all.

Latest Livewire
197
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “Somebody’s going to pay for [tax cuts for the rich]…" There. NOW it makes sense.

  2. What a heartless, dessicated piece of shit that one is. You are going straight to hell, Tom Price. Straight to hell.

  3. Bankrupt, sick, destitute old people will flock to the polls by the millions and cast votes for the GOP and Trump in 2018 and 2020. Republicans aren’t sweating blowback.

  4. “Dr.” Price took the Hypocritic Oath: “First, do major harm…”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

191 more replies

Participants

Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for marby Avatar for feathered_head Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for downriverdem Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for ottnott Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for careysub Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for seehowtheyrun Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for vladomatic Avatar for edhedh Avatar for katscherger Avatar for dannysgrandma Avatar for eisenst Avatar for justruss Avatar for 19tibekius6

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: