Obamacare Author Tom Harkin: Court Ruling Against Subsidies Is ‘Nuts’

FILE - In this Nov. 7, 2013 file photo, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. Boosting the federal minimum wage as President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are proposi... FILE - In this Nov. 7, 2013 file photo, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. Boosting the federal minimum wage as President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are proposing would increase earnings for more than 16.5 million people by 2016 but also cut employment by roughly 500,000 workers, Congress' nonpartisan budget analyst said Tuesday. Harkin, author of the Senate legislation, cited other research concluding that a higher minimum wage would create jobs, not reduce them. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), the chairman of the health committee and a chief author of Obamacare, tore into an appeals court ruling this week that forbid the federal exchange to provide subsidies to millions of Americans in 36 states.

“It’s nuts,” he told TPM in an interview in the Capitol on Thursday.

Harkin said he’s certain Congress intended to provide the premium tax credits on the federal HealthCare.gov exchange, rather than simply the state exchange, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday.

“Of course we did!” an impassioned Harkin said. “It’s plain to see. You can read our reports and everything else. … I was one of the people who wrote it! Of course we wanted it to be accessible to everyone, not just people on state exchanges.”

The senator said he doesn’t recall any discussion during the drafting of the law to forbid subsidies on the federal exchange. “No,” he said. “I don’t know of anything like that.” He suggested the judges misconstrued what is, at best, a poorly worded section of the law. “The Fourth Circuit [Court of Appeals] got it right,” he said, referring to a separate circuit court ruling that upheld the subsidies.

The Obama administration intends to request an en banc ruling at the D.C. Circuit, or a re-vote where all active judge may participate. Harkin, who is retiring in January, said there’s “no doubt” in his mind the full bench will reverse the decision, after which he predicted the Supreme Court wouldn’t take the case.

“It was a three judge panel that decided that. Two of them are Republicans, one’s a Democrat, and they just decided that way,” he said. “They’ve appealed it to an en banc setting and it’ll be overturned. There’s no doubt in my mind.”

If the ruling stands it would blow a huge hole in Obamacare and imperil the sustainability of other core provisions of the law. Millions of Americans would see their premiums rise, some of whom would no longer be able to afford insurance.

Latest Livewire
5
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. When the GOPers refused to let Obama appoint the rest of the bench in the DC appellate court we knew we would see something like this. Thank goodness this one comes with a “delete” button.

  2. How would Harkin know? He just wrote the bill. Obviously, these conservative activist judges know what was going on inside Harkin’s head better than Harkin does.

  3. All the GOP wants to do is disrupt and destroy. If they can kill the Federal Government, then they’ll start on the states.

    There’s no doubt in my mind that they have no interest in wielding the power of Government. They just want to create a power vacuum in which their big corporate masters are the only authority.

  4. “If the ruling stands it would blow a huge hole in Obamacare and imperil the sustainability of other core provisions of the law. Millions of Americans would see their premiums rise, some of whom would no longer be able to afford insurance.”

    There is a split of authority. For this to be a blow to Obamacare the Supreme Court would have to uphold it. Otherwise, it will be ignored by the IRS.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doninsd Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for John_Boner

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: