Top House Republican: GOP Can’t Sue Obama, Then Ask Him To Act On Border

FILE - In this Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013 file photo, U.S. Rep. Tom Cole, R-Oklahoma, gestures as he speaks during a town hall meeting in Duncan, Okla. Cole says he is firmly opposed to U.S. military intervention in Sy... FILE - In this Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013 file photo, U.S. Rep. Tom Cole, R-Oklahoma, gestures as he speaks during a town hall meeting in Duncan, Okla. Cole says he is firmly opposed to U.S. military intervention in Syria and predicts a resolution approving the action will have a difficult time passing the Republican-controlled U.S. House. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A senior House Republican said Friday that his caucus couldn’t simultaneously sue President Barack Obama for perceived abuse of executive authority and expect him to act unilaterally to address the border crisis.

Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK), a close ally of House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), was asked to reconcile the last-minute scrapping of border legislation with the House GOP’s lawsuit in an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“There was a contradiction yesterday that I’m still struggling to understand,” panelist Eugene Robinson said. “The leadership statement when the bill didn’t pass essentially said, ‘Well, but there are plenty of administrative things that President Obama can do and should be doing at the border.’ And that was a day after the house voted to sue President Obama for taking administrative action. So how does that square?”

Cole didn’t disagree.

“Look, you can’t say on the one hand that the President’s overreaching by acting without legislative authority and direction, and then refuse to give him legislative authority and direction in another area,” he said.

“We’ve got a good bill that actually addresses the problem, a problem the President has identified but refused to produce a solution to, provides an adequate amount of money to get us to the end of the year,” he added. “We’ll continue to give him additional resources next year. But the first thing is to actually pass legislation across the House floor. So I’ll tell you that’s what we’re going to do today. I’m not going to point a lot of fingers at the president until we get our own job done.”

The lawsuit against Obama specifically challenges his use of executive authority to delay deadlines under Obamacare. Boehner alluded to the President’s ability to act without Congress to address the border situation Friday on Twitter.

The House plans to vote on a revised border bill on Friday.

h/t Huffington Post

This post has been updated.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Jeebus on a Triscuit. Many of us pointed this out days ago.

  2. No shit, Sherlock.

    The GOP old guard only appeals to reason when they’re trying to rein in the Tea Party from acting against GOP interests.

  3. Avatar for bdtex bdtex says:

    “We’ll continue to give him additional resources next year. …”

    Oh yeah! We believe that.

  4. Avatar for dnl dnl says:

    Well DUH!!!

  5. Avatar for yskov yskov says:

    I’m sure I disagree with this guy on just about any point of policy, but I will give him credit for recognizing that the idea of a working federal government is not anathema. Not the first time he’s come out in support of the idea of Congress actually passing workable laws.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

46 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for jw1 Avatar for vertone Avatar for coronakid Avatar for avattoir Avatar for chammy Avatar for vonq Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for yskov Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for gr Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for EqualOpportunityCynic Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for mtblaze Avatar for pine Avatar for abierce Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for ltmcdies Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for footballbat Avatar for 62fender Avatar for Lupus_In_Fabula

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: