The Texas Senate on Friday passed a bill that would allow licensed handgun owners to openly carry their firearms in a shoulder or belt holster, the Texas Tribune news website reported on Friday.
The bill passed 20-11 after an hours-long debate over the addition of an amendment that would prevent police officers from checking for proper licensing of people openly carrying handguns, the site reported.
The amendment passed and reportedly received support from Democrats who said it would prevent racial profiling and conservatives who said it would protect Fourth Amendment rights.
Small changes to the bill will need House approval before being sent to Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX), who has said he will approve any open carry legislation that crosses his desk, the site reported.
The passage of the open-carry bill comes after a mass shooting Sunday, at a Twin Peaks restaurant in Waco, Texas, left nine dead and more than a dozen wounded.
Abbott addressed the fatal shooting and the open-carry legislation on Monday, according to the Texas Tribune.
“Well, the shootout occurred when we don’t have open carry,” Abbott said. “So obviously the current laws didn’t stop anything like that.”
Well, of course. What else would you expect from Texas?
Does Abbott mean that the “current laws” did not provide for the police who did stop the shootout? But hey, the more guns the more fun, like the “Gunfight at OK Corral.”
Is there something in Texas water that makes people stupid?
In a companion bill Texas lawmakers voted unanimously to mandate that firefighters fight fire with unleaded fuel accelerant instead of water.
(Edit) Abbott said: “We did not have A and B occurred, so Texas common sense says we just need A to stop B”
How about trying this instead: First determine how biker gang members (and others) with felony records got their guns. Second, attack the gun conveyance means that fostered this. If it is the secondary market that allows unfettered transfer of guns from straw purchasers to criminals (as former ATF agents have decried) than deal with this dangerous practice by mandating Smart guns that will not fire outside the hands of original purchasers. This would certainly not be a cure all for gun mayhem, but is a much better start than simply making it easier for biker criminals and other criminals to openly carry the firearms they get because gun laws are weak.
I think the Democrats in Texas got it wrong on the amendment. I see their profiling point but not allowing any police to check for licensing until presumably they’ve shot the gun is asinine. But, what do you expect from the Texas Lege?
What’s so sad is that Texans work hard at shit like this.