SCOTUS Halts Ruling Allowing VA Trans Student To Use Bathroom Of His Identity

FILE This Tuesday Aug. 25, 2015 file photo shows Gavin Grimm on his front porch during an interview at his home in Gloucester, Va. A U.S. appeals court has overturned a policy barring a transgender student from usin... FILE This Tuesday Aug. 25, 2015 file photo shows Gavin Grimm on his front porch during an interview at his home in Gloucester, Va. A U.S. appeals court has overturned a policy barring a transgender student from using the boys' restrooms at his Virginia high school. A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday, April 19, 2016 that the Gloucester County School Board policy is discriminatory. A federal judge had earlier rejected Grimm's sex discrimination claim. (AP Photo/Steve Helber) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court issued an order Wednesday temporarily halting the rulings of lower courts that allowed a transgender student in Virginia to use the bathroom matching his identity. By a 5-3 vote, with Justice Stephen Breyer joining the court’s conservatives, the Supreme Court put the decision on hold while it decides whether it takes up the case.

The case was brought by Gavin Grimm, who sued Gloucester County School Board over its policy requiring students use the bathrooms of their “biological sex.”

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in favor of the Obama administration’s arguments that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 could be interpreted to be protective of trans students, according to Buzzfeed, and from there a trial court ordered that the school not implement the policy.

The Supreme Court’s order Wednesday means that Grimm will be prohibited from using the male bathroom at his school when classes resume.

Breyer said in a concurrence to the order that he had voted to halt the ruling “as a courtesy,” while noting that “we are currently in recess, and that granting a stay will preserve the status quo (as of the time the Court of Appeals made its decision).”

If the Supreme Court decides not to take up the full case, the stay on the lower court’s decision will terminate, the order said. If the court grants a full hearing to case, the ruling will remained blocked until the Supreme Court issues its final judgment.

Read the order below:

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: