GOP Rep: Mueller Is ‘Not Being Favorable To The President’

UNITED STATES - MARCH 18: Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla., participates in the House Armed Services Committee hearing on "The President's Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against ISIL and the FY2016 N... UNITED STATES - MARCH 18: Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla., participates in the House Armed Services Committee hearing on "The President's Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against ISIL and the FY2016 National Defense Authorization Budget Request from the Department of Defense" on Wednesday, March 18, 2015. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS

Rep. Steve Russell (R-OK) said Friday that special counsel Robert Mueller “is not being favorable to the President.”

During an interview, CNN’s Poppy Harlow asked Russell if the House Oversight Committee, of which he is a member, would investigate a whistleblower’s claims that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had texted a business associate on Inauguration Day to tell him that an elaborate plan to build nuclear reactors across the Middle East was “good to go.” The plan, according to the whistleblower’s account, had been hindered by America dropping sanctions against Russia.

“Do you think it should be investigated by your committee?” Harlow asked.

“I think that you have to look at the fact that we already have a special investigator that’s been appointed by the President, one that, you know, quite frankly many people see that he is not being favorable to the President, depending upon what political viewpoint you have,” Russell said.

“I don’t think there’s some issue on the other side of the aisle that, you know, Mr. Mueller is being unfair,” he added. “Those investigations are handled by special investigators.”

Harlow pressed on why Russell’s committee couldn’t handle the probe itself.

“We are already looking at it, it’s already been brought to our attention,” Russell said before hedging.

“We’ve made a determination at this stage that it’s already being handled in other ways with the evidence that we see. If new evidence should come to light or something that would cause us to want to go into a deeper investigation, well then, we’ll have to see that evidence.”

157
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for krux krux says:

    “House Oversight Committee”

    Can’t we find a more accurate name for them?

  2. “is not being favorable to the President.”

    And???

    He being fair, and favorable to justice and the truth, thats what matters. It would be a bad thing if people investigating a crime were favorable to the person being investigated.

  3. House Lalalalala We Can’t Hear You Committee?

  4. you want favorable? Or do you want objective? republicans are such dimwits, I can’t believe they can even fill out the paperwork to run for office.

  5. THAT’S NOT HIS FUCKING JOB!

    He is an INDEPENDENT SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, not someone like YOU, a sycophant lapdog to the all-powerful Orange ShitGibbon.

    STFU and DO YOUR JOB.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

151 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for leftflank Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for krusher Avatar for inversion Avatar for sister Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for tsp Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for canary02 Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for milt69 Avatar for thinski Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for gromilini Avatar for snafubar

Continue Discussion