Walker: I Meant The Scouts Ban On Gay Leaders ‘Protected’ Kids From Politics

Governor Scott Walker (Republican of Wisconsin) Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National at National Harbor, Maryland, America - 26 Feb 2015 (Rex Features via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Presidential candidate and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) said on Wednesday that when he described the Boy Scouts ban on gay leaders as having “protected children,” he meant that it had protected them from political debate.

On Tuesday, a day after entering the 2016 race, Walker, an Eagle Scout, was asked about the recent decision by the Boy Scouts of America to lift its longstanding ban on gay troop leaders.

Walker told the Independent Journal Review he supported the ban because it “protected children and advanced Scout values.”

The comments were met with outrage by LGBT rights groups, including the Human Rights Campaign. In a statement sent to TPM, the group called his comments “shameful and offensive.”

But during a Wednesday press conference in South Carolina, according to the New York Times, Walker said his comments had been misunderstood.

“The protection was not a physical protection,” he said, according to the Times. Instead, it was about “protecting them from being involved in the very thing you’re talking about right now, the political and media discussion about it, instead of just focusing on what Scouts is about, which is about camping and citizenship and things of that nature.”

Latest Livewire
95
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I call bullshit.

    If that’s what he meant why didn’t he say it in the first place?

  2. “The protection was not a physical protection,” he said, according to the Times. Instead, it was about “protecting them from being involved in the very thing you’re talking about right now, the political and media discussion about it, instead of just focusing on what Scouts is about, which is about camping and citizenship and things of that nature.”

    That makes no fucking sense at all. You’re worried that gay scout leaders are gonna talk politics with the kids?

  3. Clearly, Walker just wants to protect kids from political debate by turning the Boy Scouts into a political debate.

    What’s not to understand???

  4. Avatar for jinnj jinnj says:

    logical extension -
    a racist whites only school is simply protecting the children from getting caught up in racial debates.
    Nobody with a brain buys your lame-o answer Scott!

  5. In his zeal to toe the ultra conservative right-wing line, Walker forgets that there are some states where voters recognize other issues besides hating those who are not just like you. It’ll be interesting to see how his extremist positions play in states like NH, where just hating gays doesn’t earn you many votes.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

89 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for wiscojoe Avatar for trnc Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for ottnott Avatar for apt604 Avatar for leeks Avatar for truthdogg Avatar for scarshapedstar Avatar for zuch Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for cpl593h Avatar for rwlorenz Avatar for jordanolsen26 Avatar for canadianhere

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: