GOP Rep. Struggles To Explain His Stance On Gay Candidates For Office

UNITED STATES – MARCH 27: Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., speaks during the Republican Study Committee news conference to unveil a FY2013 budget proposal on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (... UNITED STATES – MARCH 27: Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., speaks during the Republican Study Committee news conference to unveil a FY2013 budget proposal on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Republican congressman from New Jersey is finally responding to a July 2015 report that alleged he was withholding donations to the House campaign arm because he thought it actively recruited and supported gay candidates.

Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) told The Record newspaper Wednesday that he thinks seeking political office is “everyone’s right,” but he also said he would only support candidates who advocated “traditional marriage.”

The original Politico report, which cited multiple anonymous sources, said Garrett withheld paying dues to the National Republican Congressional Committee because it supported gay primary candidates. Garrett’s office did not respond to the report at the time.

In his interview with The Record, Garrett said that report was a “fabrication.”

Referencing a past interview, Garrett also told the newspaper that he would only back candidates who support the platform of “fiscal responsibility” and “traditional marriage.”

“I said I support everyone’s right to run for public office,” he told the newspaper from his Washington office. “I said at that time I will support those people who support the Republican platform, which is fiscal responsibility [and] traditional marriage.”

Garrett blamed the media for the perception that he was against gay candidates and argued he’d already clarified his position.

“It’s sort of incumbent on the reporter for the paper to say, ‘Well, wait a minute, what proof do you have on that? … He clarified his position nine months ago,” he told the Record. “You’re just telling a different narrative than what he said. You’re making things up, if I may be so bold, you’re lying because he clarified that back nine months ago.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Bottom.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  2. Shorter Garrett: I’ll only support gay candidates if they don’t think that they should be able to get married themselves.

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    “I’m not against all gays or gay candidates, just against the ones who think gay people should be treated like human beings.”

    Or maybe by “traditional marriage” he means something a little more authoritarian.

  4. tell me again… how does being a Log Cabin Republican work?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

18 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for estamm Avatar for humpback Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for dswx Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for drf55 Avatar for thenme Avatar for jcblues Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for dnl Avatar for pshah Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for dewelar

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: