Dem Sens: GOP Stonewalling Of SCOTUS Nom Is Gov’t Shutdown All Over Again

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., right, accompanied by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., holds up a letter in opposition to the Paycheck Fairness Act during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Apri... Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., right, accompanied by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., holds up a letter in opposition to the Paycheck Fairness Act during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 8, 2014. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke) MORE LESS

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Wednesday compared Senate Republicans’ calls to block President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee to the government shutdown in 2013.

“We’ve seen this movie before,” Schumer told reporters on a press call. “When the hard right doesn’t get its way, their immediate reaction is shut it down, and Sen. McConnell marches in lockstep.”

“That’s what happened in 2013 when the Republican leadership tried to shut down the government. They’re doing it today with their attempts to shut down the Supreme Court,” Schumer continued. “But just as in 2013, when there was a huge public outcry and Sen. McConnell had to back off, the same will happen now. Sen. McConnell will have to back off.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) echoed Schumer’s comments on the call while describing how the American public is reacting to Republican calls to block any nominee.

“The outrage and outcry against shutting down the Supreme Court in effect is motivated by all the feelings that were prompted by shutting down the government,” Blumenthal said.

“And this stance by the Republicans epitomizes what people regard as the worst characteristic of Washington today, which is partisan paralysis and gridlock,” he continued. “The game-playing and blame-gaming that people find so abhorrent in Washington today is reflected in this stance by our Republican colleagues.”

Both senators expressed confidence that Senate Republicans will have to relent and allow a confirmation process eventually.

“We’re already see in the Republican coalition, which seemed unified the day Sen. McConnell announced his desire to prevent hearings and a vote on any nominee the president would offer, we’re seeing that coalition begin to crack,” Schumer said, citing the few Republican senators who have expressed some willingness to take a vote on Obama’s nominee.

“I believe that we will be able to have hearings and get a vote,” Schumer continued. “It’s gonna be deja vu all over again for our friends on the other side of the aisle. Same thing that happened — they tried to shut down the government, they did for a few weeks, but had to back off without achieving their goals.”

Blumenthal said he believes that Republicans “must and will relent.”

15
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I’m sorry Sen. Schumer, the constitution specifically says that all appointments to the SCOTUS must be made by a white Republican president with an American name!!!111!!!11!

  2. Avatar for bkmn bkmn says:

    Once again he is being far too kind to the GOP. Democrats need to start stating the truth - Republicans don’t care about the good of the country.

  3. “That’s what happened in 2013 when the Republican leadership tried to shut down the government. They’re doing it today with their attempts to shut down the Supreme Court,” Schumer continued.

    In the interest of stating facts, Republicans are not “shutting down” SCOTUS. They are not preventing any SCOTUS function from continuing. 8 Justices can temporarily do the court’s duties. There are cases wherein a Justice recuses themselves due to conflict of interest and the remaining 8 hear oral arguments and render a decision. I suppose fighting nonsensical GOP hyperbole with Democrat nonsensical hyperbole works for the public relations game involved, but it’s weak tea in addressing the issue at hand.

  4. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    With the current court composition, there are a lot of decisions that the supreme court can’t make, because a deadlock affirms the lower court ruling without setting a precedent. If you get down to 7 from recusal, things get really weird. (With executive-branch agencies, decisions made by less than a majority of the proper number of members can be challenged; there’s no similar thing with the court. Yet. But if you had any 4-3 decisions against a case that conservatives brought you can be darn sure there’d be a crisis.)

  5. If the President was GOP, they’d be tripping over themselves to get a confirmation hearing ASAP.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

9 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for blue_grit Avatar for dv01 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for johnrm Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for bkmn Avatar for albesure Avatar for massie Avatar for decided_voter

Continue Discussion