Guess Who Thinks Trump’s Carrier Deal Was Really Just ‘Crony Capitalism’

Sarah Palin speaks during a panel discussion before a preview of the film "Climate Hustle" on Capitol Hill, on Thursday, April 14, 2016, in Washington. Palin says voters won’t stand for it if Republican power broke... Sarah Palin speaks during a panel discussion before a preview of the film "Climate Hustle" on Capitol Hill, on Thursday, April 14, 2016, in Washington. Palin says voters won’t stand for it if Republican power brokers try to take the presidential nomination away from Donald Trump or Ted Cruz at the GOP convention this summer. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Critics of Donald Trump’s deal to prevent 800 jobs at a Carrier Plant in Indianapolis from being outsourced to Mexico say that the President-elect had simply paid off the business with Indiana tax dollars to score a public relations victory. Add one unexpected name to that list: Sarah Palin.

Palin, who this week was was briefly rumored to be under consideration as Trump’s secretary of veterans affairs, published an op-ed for Young Conservatives on Friday that argued forcefully against the deal with the headline “But… Wait… The Good Guys Won’t Win With More Crony Capitalism.”

“When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent,” she wrote. “Meanwhile, the invisible hand that best orchestrates a free people’s free enterprise system gets amputated. Then, special interests creep in and manipulate markets. Republicans oppose this, remember? Instead, we support competition on a level playing field, remember? Because we know special interest crony capitalism is one big fail.”

Palin compared the deal to tax incentives that the Obama administration had given the solar energy company Solyndra—a move that gave conservatives outrage fodder for years—writing that “burdensome federal government imposition is never the solution.”

“Gotta’ have faith the Trump team knows all this,” she continued. “And I’ll be the first to acknowledge concerns over a deal cut by leveraging taxpayer interests to make a manufacturer stay put are unfounded – once terms are made public.”

According to a report from Fortune, citing an anonymous source with knowledge of the deal, Carrier’s parent company United Technologies has agreed to receive $700,000 a year in exchange for maintaining more than a thousand jobs in Indianapolis, the bulk of which had previously been slated for Mexican workers. One member of the Indiana Economic Development Corporation suggested that Carrier could be keeping the jobs stateside to keep on Trump’s good side, given that 10 percent of the company’s business comes from contracts with the federal government.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Ha, Ha Thanks for the laugh!

    1-Guess she didn’t get the cabinet position.
    2-Geeeezus- we have to be on the same team now?
    3-Even Orwell, long in the grave, is spinning at high speed from all the cognitive dissonance in the air. The water, the soil….next it will be in the damn beer!

  2. Avatar for darcy darcy says:

    “When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent," she wrote.

    “she wrote?” I don’t think so.

  3. Avatar for j.dave j.dave says:

    I thought “Bush ethics” would be the knee-slapper of the day, but that was before “Palin op-ed.”

  4. Yeah, that whole statement is distinctly non-Palinesque. Far too literate.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

79 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for jackson_frisell Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for rfscalf Avatar for charliee Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for pickwick Avatar for deckbose Avatar for becca656 Avatar for tim Avatar for darcy Avatar for eekahil Avatar for dnl Avatar for clauscph Avatar for joriep Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for canadianhere Avatar for chlarry Avatar for birdford Avatar for j.dave Avatar for woland66 Avatar for overthefall96 Avatar for jadez

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: