Ryan: ‘Nobody Knows’ If Massive Tax Cuts Will Pay For Themselves

House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., center, leaves the House Chamber after voting yes on the Republican tax bill, Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2017, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., center, leaves the House Chamber after voting on the Republican tax bill, Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2017, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Republicans muscled the most sweeping rewrite of the n... House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., center, leaves the House Chamber after voting on the Republican tax bill, Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2017, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Republicans muscled the most sweeping rewrite of the nation's tax laws in more than three decades through the House. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) said Wednesday that “nobody knows” if Republicans’ tax bill, which would overwhelmingly benefit corporations and the wealthy while adding more than $1.4 trillion to the deficit, would pay for itself.

“Are you saying that the growth you’re going to get from this tax cut will equal the amount it would cost on the deficit side, so that it’s a wash?” Savannah Guthrie asked Ryan in an interview Wednesday. 

“Nobody knows the answer to that question, because that’s in the future,” Ryan said. “But what we do know is that this will increase economic growth.”

The CBO estimated in late November that the tax bill would add more than $1.4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years.

Ryan also said, incorrectly, that “every study under the sun” showed that Republicans’ tax bill would spur economic growth.

He specifically cited surveys from the National Association of Manufacturers, an advocacy group, which he said showed “the vast majority of businesses are going to do just what we say: reinvest in their workers, reinvest in their factories, pay people more money, higher wages.”

The question of higher wages, Ryan said, was not a question of “if” but “how much.”

He was responding to an op-ed from Michael Bloomberg, cited by Guthrie, which read: “It’s pure fantasy to think that the tax bill will lead to significantly higher wages and growth.”

In fact — as highlighted by an embarrassing video from a Wall Street Journal event for CEOs but also in a survey from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch strategist John Shin, reported in Bloomberg in November — corporations will likely use their massive tax windfalls to pay down debts and buy back shares, boosting their stock prices and pleasing investors.

You can point to these anecdotes, but I will just tell you, every study under the sun shows us, you lower the tax rates, make us more competitive, you will see faster economic growth in America,” Ryan responded to that criticism.

The National Association of Manufacturers’ survey, incidentally, allowed respondents to choose more than one answer for what they would do with their saved tax dollars, including “increase capital spending,” “expand your business” and “hire more workers.” “Buy back shares” wasn’t an option.

Several of America’s largest corporations — including what would be the tax bill’s largest beneficiary, Apple — have not indicated they intend to expand their hiring or raise wages as a result of the tax bill’s likely passage.

Ryan noted separately that, in addition to Republicans’ tax cut bill, “we’ve got to control our spending. That, we have more work to do.”

“We clearly have to go after spending control.”

Watch below via NBC:

Latest Livewire
123
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The stress of passing this legislation has led Mr. Ryan to confuse his pronouns and syntax. I think what he was trying to say is: “Everyone knows that these cuts will increase the deficit and inequality, and nobody in my party cares.”

  2. I wonder what kind of spending he wants to control. ???

  3. “I mean, look at the study we did in Kansas, where we actually implemented these policies, and their economy exploded, and the tax cuts paid for themselves almost immediately…”

  4. The National Association of Manufacturers’ survey, incidentally, allowed respondents to choose more than one answer for what they would do with their saved tax dollars, including “increase capital spending,” “expand your business” and “hire more workers.” “Buy back shares” wasn’t an option.

    How would you rate Paul Ryan’s performance as Speaker of the House?
    A. Perfect.
    B. Excellent.
    C. Great.
    D. Good.

    “See, 90% of respondents think I’m doing a good job!” - Paul Ryan

  5. Avatar for docd docd says:

    If we look at the historical economic performance of these boondoggles, we have a pretty good idea.
    I think Dems should adopt the mantra when we start hearing the inevitable proposals to cut entitlements. “Wait–you said that it would bring in revenue. Why not just wait a bit, and then the increased revenue will take care of the cost of entitlements at the same time that it pays for the tax cuts. Don’t you have any faith in your economic policy?”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

117 more replies

Participants

Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for meri Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for irasdad Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for texasaggie Avatar for inversion Avatar for murgatroid Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for dickweed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for tsp Avatar for fraufeix Avatar for milt69 Avatar for katscherger Avatar for maximus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: