Ryan: CBO Is ‘Important,’ But ‘More To The Story’ Than Coverage Numbers

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., center, joined by, from left, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, meets with reporters following a GOP strategy session at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 27, 2017.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., right, joined by, from left, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Calif., and Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, meets with reporters following a GOP strategy session, Tuesday, June 27,... House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., right, joined by, from left, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Calif., and Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, meets with reporters following a GOP strategy session, Tuesday, June 27, 2017, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) expressed confidence in the director of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday, but noted that “there’s more to the story” than the dramatic drop in insurance coverage that the CBO estimated would result from Senate Republicans’ Obamacare repeal bill.

At a press briefing Tuesday, a reporter asked Ryan if he had confidence in CBO Director Keith Hall.

“Yeah, he is actually a Republican appointee,” Ryan said. “If I’m not mistaken, Tom Price appointed him.”

“Look, I have always had my own complaints about methodologies and score keeping,” he continued. “We all have our preferences and our opinions on these things. But it is important that we have a scorekeeper. We can always complain about the nature of the score. I think their coverage numbers — there’s more to the story than what the number implies. But having said that, it’s important that we have a referee.”

In its analysis of Senate Republicans’ bill released Monday, the CBO estimated that 22 million fewer people would have insurance coverage by 2026 if it were passed into law, versus the status quo under Obamacare.

House Republicans, before and after the CBO estimated their Obamacare repeal bill would leave 23 million more people without coverage, often criticized the CBO as an inaccurate forecaster.

In an interview with “Fox & Friends’” Brian Kilmeade that aired Monday, Ryan argued that the coverage numbers reflected the Senate bill’s repeal of Obamacare’s individual mandate, under which most Americans are eligible to pay a penalty if they do not have insurance.

What they are basically saying at the Congressional Budget Office is if you are not going to force people to buy Obamacare — if you are not going to force people to buy something they don’t want — then they won’t buy it,” Ryan said. “So it’s not that people are getting pushed off a plan, it’s that people will choose not to buy something they don’t like or want.”

In addition to individuals who the CBO estimated would choose not to purchase insurance coverage if they didn’t face a penalty, however, the CBO also estimated that by 2026, 15 million fewer people would be enrolled in Medicaid versus the status quo.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. For once, he’s absolutely right. There is much more to the story than mere numbers. Such as the lives that will be ended or made more miserable if either the House or Senate bill were to become law.

  2. Despicable lying sociopath is lying frantically.

  3. “What they are basically saying at the Congressional Budget Office is if you are not going to force people to buy Obamacare — if you are not going to force people to buy something they don’t want — then they won’t buy it,” Ryan said. “So it’s not that people are getting pushed off a plan, it’s that people will choose not to buy something they don’t like or want.”

    Two points:

    1. Nobody likes or wants to buy health insurance, but anyone paying attention knows what without health insurance, an accident or unexpected diagnosis can put you at serious risk of personal bankruptcy. Insurance becomes affordable to everyone if everyone has to get into the pool, not just the sickest (and we never know when we will become sick).

    2. Remember that more than 3/4 of Americans of voting age chose not to vote for someone that they didn’t like or want for President. So, can we get a CBO recommendation to get rid of Trump?

  4. “People should be able to forego their own personal healthcare coverage, increase their future burden to society, and increase the current risks and costs of those who cannot indulge that choice.” AKA the “more for me, but really less for me, and also fuck you” plan.

    Cool story.

  5. Yes. The rest of the story:

    Grandma cutting up her pills and dining on cat food.
    Cancer patients dying because they can’t get care.
    Women getting breast cancer because Planned Parenthood was defunded.
    People with HIV going to full-blown AIDS & dying because their meds are no longer affordable.
    Emergency rooms overwhelmed with people seeking catastrophic care because they lack basic preventable care.

    There is SOOOO much more to the story.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

83 more replies

Participants

Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for meri Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for headhunter212 Avatar for kufpu Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for inversion Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for rb639 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for blogamator Avatar for fjasmine Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for greysea Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for aiddon Avatar for win Avatar for causeforconcern

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: