Did The Trump-Russia Dossier Grow Out Of Jeb Bush’s Super PAC?

FILE - In this Jan. 14, 2016 file photo, Republican presidential candidate, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush speaks with reporters after participating in the presidential debate at the North Charleston Coliseum, in North... FILE - In this Jan. 14, 2016 file photo, Republican presidential candidate, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush speaks with reporters after participating in the presidential debate at the North Charleston Coliseum, in North Charleston, S.C. With two weeks to go until Iowans head to the polls in the first vote of the 2016 primary season, Jeb Bush scored a key endorsement for his White House bid from Sen. Lindsey Gram, R-S.C. (AP Photo/Rainier Ehrhardt, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Following the publication of a dossier containing explosive and unverified info on Donald Trump and Russia, BBC News reported Wednesday that it originated in opposition research done by a former British intelligence officer working for a Super PAC supporting none other than Jeb Bush.

If that sounds like a too-good-to-be-true political plot twist, that’s because maybe it is—a lawyer for the PAC told TPM it “had nothing to do with British Intelligence officers.”

The Guardian reported earlier Wednesday that the former British intelligence official credited with compiling the dossier on the alleged Russia-Trump ties had been working as a subcontractor for an opposition research firm digging up dirt for one of Trump’s Republican presidential primary opponents. The article pointed out that often, research firms do not know who exactly who is hiring them.

The Guardian’s report did not name who the opposition research firm’s client was. But BBC News’ Paul Wood later reported, without citing any sources, that “the opposition research firm that commissioned the report had worked first for a superpac – political action committee – supporting Jeb Bush during the Republican primaries.”

Almost as soon as the BBC report hit Twitter, Charlie Spies, an attorney for Right to Rise USA, which had supported Bush’s presidential candidacy, disputed it.

“Right to Rise categorically denies the BBC reporter’s made up report and will be demanding that he retract the made up allegation,” Spies wrote in an email to TPM. “Other than enjoying James Bond movies, the PAC had nothing to do with British Intelligence officers.”

Spies had tweeted that the PAC’s opposition research team had denied the BBC report and that he planned to send a cease-and-desist letter to the news organization:

The head of the PAC, Mike Murphy, also tweeted and denied the report.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. It would be irresponsible not to speculate.

    This is categorically false. Working on cease & desist letter to BBC radio to stop making up fake news.

    We’re doomed.

  2. Get ya popcorn ready

  3. I thought it was Jeb …

    in the loo …

    with the plunger ----

    Now I have to go and re-formulate … DAMN IT ! —

  4. Seriously, would they know what guy did the work, even if the guy was a VP or partner? They are always about plausible deniability. The question needs to be: Did you hire a firm to look into Trump’s Russian ties? Was that firm company X? What reports did you receive and how did you act on them. Reporters in 8th grade do better.

  5. Okay. I bought a bit more yesterday.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

95 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for sysprog Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for spiderpig Avatar for eduardoinohio Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for quax Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for dickweed Avatar for artmofo Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for em_dash Avatar for dannysgrandma Avatar for jadez Avatar for loss_mentality

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: