Rand Paul: Obama Has ‘Conflict Of Interest’ In Appointing SCOTUS Nominee

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican candidate for president, responds to a question during a meeting of the Economic Club of Las Vegas at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2015. (Steve Marcus/Las V... Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican candidate for president, responds to a question during a meeting of the Economic Club of Las Vegas at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2015. (Steve Marcus/Las Vegas Sun via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who recently dropped out of the Republican presidential race, on Monday argued that President Obama has a “conflict of interest” in nominating someone to replace Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away over the weekend.

Paul suggested to Kentucky radio host Leland Conway that because there are cases challenging policies of the Obama administration, including lawsuits targeting his clean power plan and executive actions on immigration, the President should not be able to choose a nominee.

The senator said that the Supreme Court reviews cases that are “trying to figure out who has the power to do what.”

“The president has said he has the power basically to create immigration law out of nothing,” Paul said. “He says he has the power to basically cripple entire industries like coal without ever having been given that power by Congress. So see, we have a Constitutional debate on whose powers — the president or Congress? And I think the president sort of has a conflict of interest here in appointing somebody while we’re trying to decide whether or not he’s already usurped power.”

“It’s going to be very, very, very difficult to get me to vote for a presidential nomination from this president,” he continued. “I will look at it if it comes down, but my threshold for voting for somebody is going to be very, very high.”

Paul noted that Obama does have a right to nominate a justice to the Supreme Court, but added that “it is very unlikely that he’s going to find a nominee that I think isn’t going to be devastating to” Kentucky.

H/t ThinkProgress

Latest Livewire
196
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for bkmn bkmn says:

    That reasoning is more circular than the synthetic fibers on top of his head.

  2. So, he doesn’t recognize his own conflict of interests that are identical? He has policy positions. Guess he shouldn’t ever make an executive decision…oh, wait, that’s never going to be an issue, so I guess the problem solves itself…

  3. Avatar for wwss wwss says:

    Say what? Me thinks he has been bowing down to the herbal god of his college days.

  4. Rand Paul opens mouth: stupid falls out.

  5. Wow. This guy really is as dumb as they come.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

190 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jack_russell Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for milwaukeekent Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for meri Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for deckbose Avatar for cessnadriver Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for mantan Avatar for phillydave Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for jurisgal Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for dryheat Avatar for darrtown Avatar for meta Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for caltg Avatar for canadianhere

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: