Rand Paul Calls Hillary Clinton ‘A War Hawk’

Sen. Rand Paul R-Ky. speaks during the Values Voter Summit, held by the Family Research Council Action, Friday, Oct. 11, 2013, in Washington.
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) called former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton a “war hawk” and added that if she decides to run for president in 2016 voters will question whether she wants to bring the U.S. into another war in the Middle East.

Paul, himself a potential 2016 candidate, made the comments during an appearance on NBC’s Meet The Press.

“I think that’s what scares the Democrats the most, is that in a general election, were I to run, there’s going to be a lot of independents and even some Democrats who say, ‘You know what? We are tired of war,” Paul said, according to The Associated Press. “We’re worried that Hillary Clinton will get us involved in another Middle Eastern war, because she’s so gung-ho.”

Clinton, when she served in the United States Senate, voted in favor of letting then-President George W. Bush have the authority to invade Iraq. Clinton, since then, has said she regrets making that vote.

Paul’s comments as lawmakers continue to discuss the ongoing problem about the militant Islamist group ISIS in Iraq. Also on Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said the group should be taken very seriously.

In response, Democratic National Committee Press Secretary Michael Czin said that Paul’s foreign policy centers around retreating from the United States’ responsibilities. Here’s Czin’s statement:

Senator Paul’s foreign policy vision is to retreat from our responsibilities abroad by ending all foreign aid to our allies – including Israel. That’s the vision he’s laid out and defended time and time again and that even conservatives have said would bring ‘terrible misery’ to millions of people across the globe.

If Senator Paul wants to have a debate between his fringe, isolationist vision and that of Democrats who have restored our credibility around the world and brought countless service members safely home, that’s a debate we’re eager to have.

This post was updated.

Latest Livewire
169
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. randpaul should worry more about his own party.

  2. Who did he plagiarize this from?

  3. All randy has is name calling? What a weak little man.

  4. Like this is news? Hillary was proudly strutting her NeoCon colors just last week. And that was just the latest installment.

    During her tenure as secretary of state, from the inside, she argued consistently—usually in alliance with Secretary of Defense Robert Gates—for polices that were almost universally more hawkish than President Obama seemed to favor, sometimes succeeding in getting her way and sometimes not. She backed the 2009 escalation of the war in Afghanistan, argued for vastly increased US military aid to the insurgents in Syria, and was the leading administration advocate for forcible regime change in Libya. More recently, as reported by Bob Dreyfuss’s Nation blog, she broke with the Obama administration’s Iran policy, joining Israel’s Likud government and neoconservatives in the United States in supporting a zero-enrichment policy aimed at shutting down production of non–weapons grade uranium enriched to just 5 percent.

    But now, with her interview in The Atlantic with Jeffrey Goldberg, a staunch advocate for Israel and a neocon fellow traveler, she’s thrown down the gauntlet, openly ridiculing Obama’s cautious approach to world affairs. For those who’ve followed her career, at least since the 1990s, it seems to be a case of Clinton being Clinton, allowing her natural proclivity for hawkishness in foreign affairs to mingle with her political opportunism. Not wishing to let herself be outflanked on the right by hawks—who’ll rev up the Benghazi non-scandal against her in 2016 and who are conducting a nationwide propaganda campaign to blame Obama’s judicious caution for the world’s ills—Clinton has made a fateful decision to go on the offensive. In so doing, she’ll open the door for even harsher Republican criticism, starting a race to the bottom—or to the far right—on foreign policy. Just wait until 2016.

    This clip takes the cake.:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fF0JyZwqGoQ
  5. Avatar for darcy darcy says:

    As ridiculous as the Libertarian Man is, he’s right about Hillary. And her excuse for voting for war was classic Hillary. A Democrat getting labelled as a war hawk by a libertarian. Kinda funny, almost.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

163 more replies

Participants

Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for sooner Avatar for marv Avatar for UnfadingGreen Avatar for deckbose Avatar for trippin Avatar for ttshasta Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for sylhines Avatar for rick Avatar for jinx_tpm Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for darcy Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for dddinah Avatar for darrtown Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for meta Avatar for ozziecat Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for Michel56 Avatar for 62fender

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: