Strzok May Not Comply With House Subpoena To Testify, His Lawyer Says

on June 27, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 27: FBI Agent Peter Strzok arrives at a closed door interview before the House Judiciary Committee June 27, 2018 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Strzok, a former member of the Mueller Russia... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 27: FBI Agent Peter Strzok arrives at a closed door interview before the House Judiciary Committee June 27, 2018 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Strzok, a former member of the Mueller Russia investigation team, is being interviewed by the committee on text messages exchanged with former FBI lawyer Lisa Page during the Clinton e-mail server investigation that are claimed by the President Trump's supporters to show bias against the president. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The attorney for controversial FBI agent Peter Strzok said that his client is not sure if he’ll comply with a House Judiciary Committee subpoena to testify next week, telling CNN on Tuesday evening that lawmakers “don’t want the truth.”

The committee issued the subpoena to Strzok earlier Tuesday, setting a July 10 date for his open hearing.

Strzok’s attorney, Aitan Goelman, told CNN he didn’t “know whether or not” they would attend, criticizing the conduct of GOP lawmakers in the 11-hour closed-door interview Strzok sat for last week.

“We have come to the conclusion, forced to come to the conclusion, that this is not a search for truth, it is a chance for Republican members of the House to preen and posture before their most radical, conspiracy-minded constituents,” Goelman said.

Strzok is a former top counterintelligence official at the FBI who worked on both the Hillary Clinton email and Russian interference investigations. He was removed from the Russia probe and demoted after the bureau discovered dozens of anti-Trump text messages he’d exchanged with former FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

Those messages have made Strzok a target in conservative media and among some Republicans on Capitol Hill, who cite them as proof that the entire Russia probe is a partisan operation targeting President Trump.

Goelman told CNN that Strzok does want to tell his story publicly, but is just not sure he wants to do so “in front of these particular House subcommittees.”

The committee could pursue contempt remedies against Strzok if he ultimately refuses to comply with the subpoena.

Latest Livewire
43
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. He should refuse. I don’t know why this hasn’t been utilized before to avoid House Republiscum efforts to taint, mislead and outright lie about testimony.

    Have him appear in front of three big name TV network anchors. Throw in Shep from Fox as well. Have them ask in a free-wheeling 2-3 hour taped session ANY and ALL questions. Then, have it edited to say a 1 hour show, broadcast with a big build-up, to show the American people what he has to say,

    Easy-peasy!

  2. Hey, GOP…

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    He could pull the standard GOP high-and-mighty trick of insisting on approving the questions he’ll be asked.

  4. It shouldn’t matter what kind of clown show they have in mind. All he needs is a little preparation.

  5. I wonder if Jim Jordan’s “unfortunate” situation contributed to Strzok and his lawyers reasoning and decision. The statement also hints that he would testify before some other less nutzo committee. “Strzok does want to tell his story publicly, but is just not sure he wants to do so in front of these particular House subcommittees.” Perhaps the Senate Intelligence Committee might be interested.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

37 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for fess Avatar for yellowdogfox Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for pachy Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for timr Avatar for dont Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for danny Avatar for dbutch Avatar for litho Avatar for drschmitt Avatar for jviscont1 Avatar for massie Avatar for patl Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for machoneman Avatar for maximus Avatar for clare Avatar for ohcomeonnow Avatar for atldrew

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: