Peter King On GOP’s Iran Letter: ‘Yeah, I Wouldn’t Have Done It’

Rep. Peter King, R-NY. speaks at the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) Legislative Conference and Presidential Forum in Washington, Tuesday, March 10, 2015. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) doesn’t have a problem with the content of the letter that 47 Senate Republicans sent to Iran in the hopes of undermining the Obama administration’s nuclear weapons negotiations. Rather, the New York Congressman just thinks it was a bad idea to send the letter to Iran’s leaders.

“Yeah, I wouldn’t have done it,” King said on the John Gambling Show, which Buzzfeed flagged. “Now, I agree with everything that’s in the letter, I just don’t believe that the members of Congress, either House or Senate, should be negotiating or contacting directly a foreign government which is negotiating with the president. I think it undermines the office of the presidency.”

King had previously said he was unsure if he would have signed the letter.

There’s been a fair amount of blowback since the letter, spearheaded by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), was sent. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also sounded a similar note to King saying that his only “regret is who it’s addressed to.”

“No matter how I would feel about the Obama administration, I wouldn’t have done the letter,” King continued in the radio interview, “and I think what it’s done also is, there was really the chance of a solid partisan coalition to enact legislation requiring that Congress have to approve this agreement. This is going to make it harder to get that bipartisan support. Whether it should or not, the reality is that it does because it makes it more of a partisan issue.”

President Barack Obama also took a jab at the Republicans who signed the letter saying he was “embarrassed” for them.

Latest Livewire
16
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. That’s nice Peter…but the propaganda arm of you party is busy trying to re-sell the entire debacle as Obama attempting to “oust” Bibi, as if he’s the one interfering with Israeli politics, not vice versa…

  2. Yup, no problem with…wait for it…the…da, da, daaaa…content. Wait, wait, is that a killer I don’t care about tripping himself up and requiring nearly balls to the wall cable coverage as the Iran talks near completion and the traitor letter grows in anti GOP relevance? Your secret, SCOTUS-approved billionaire distraction dollars at work…

  3. “The IRA would have told me not to.”

  4. Because Peter is only interested in the Muslims under your bed.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

10 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for blue_grit Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for trippin Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for mantan Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for sniffit Avatar for leeks Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for mikev

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: