Ryan Backs Senate Leaders Blocking SCOTUS Nom: ‘It’s About Principle’

In this photo taken Feb. 2, 2016, House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis. speaks in Washington. Ryan said Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2016, Republicans need to stop fighting angrily among themselves and not be distracted by guns or o... In this photo taken Feb. 2, 2016, House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis. speaks in Washington. Ryan said Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2016, Republicans need to stop fighting angrily among themselves and not be distracted by guns or other "hot-button" issues that President Barack Obama raises. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) said in a statement Wednesday that he supported his Senate Republican colleagues who have said they won’t move forward with President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nomination.

“This has never been about who the nominee is. It is about a basic principle,” Ryan said in the statement. “Under our Constitution, the president has every right to make this nomination, and the Senate has every right not to confirm a nominee.”

Ryan’s statement came after Obama announced from the White House’s Rose Garden that he was nominating DC Circuit Court Judge Merrick Garland to succeed the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. Obama called for a “fair” process that would allow Garland an interview and a vote in the Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has repeatedly said the Senate won’t vote on President Obama’s nomination.

Here’s Ryan’s full statement:

This has never been about who the nominee is. It is about a basic principle. Under our Constitution, the president has every right to make this nomination, and the Senate has every right not to confirm a nominee. I fully support Leader McConnell and Chairman Grassley’s decision not to move forward with the confirmation process. We should let the American people decide the direction of the court.

Latest Livewire
57
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. If it’s not about the actual nominee, then it’s not principled.

    Attention self-proclaimed Constitution lovers in the GOP: If the founders wanted direct elections of Supreme Court justices, they would’ve put that in there.

  2. Remind me Ryan, what principle is that? These are the folks who spout following the Constitution strictly. I cannot wait until we kick their asses in November.

  3. Avatar for jsfox jsfox says:

    Principal!? Well if the Republican Party had any you might have a point.

  4. Yep, they’re being dicks on principle. Just because.

  5. Then someone needs to remind him of this again

    “If we lose the election, Hillary Clinton’s going to pick somebody who I wouldn’t pick. I’m telling every conservative now: don’t expect to lose the election and still get your way.”

    Lindsey Graham

    For some reason, these modern GOP party elders seem to believe that Trump is going to win the general or he is going to get blunted by either Kasich or Cruz.

    Let’s see how that works out…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

51 more replies

Participants

Avatar for codegen86 Avatar for ajm Avatar for fgs Avatar for jw1 Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for hoppy Avatar for deckbose Avatar for clemmers Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for voreason Avatar for patterman Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for hychka Avatar for connski Avatar for astro_walker Avatar for addicted4444 Avatar for twowolves Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for dnl Avatar for kfraz43 Avatar for johniwaniszek Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for jreitzes Avatar for nalinali

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: