Updated 3:02 p.m.
A member of Colorado’s state Board of Education argued that the fact that the United States voluntarily ended slavery proved “American execptionalism” and this perspective should be taught to students in a recent Facebook post about the AP U.S. History curriculum.
Businesswoman Pam Mazanec, who was elected to represent Colorado’s 4th Congressional district on the board, jumped into a discussion about the AP History course framework Saturday on a Facebook page that describes itself as “a place where teachers and parents are encouraged to speak freely about their issues, questions, and concerns in the Douglas County School District.” The Colorado Independent flagged her comment on Thursday.
Mazanec’s first posts in the thread raised the possibility that the AP History course framework may have been conceived by people with an “agenda,” prompting an AP English teacher to respond by explaining that experienced AP teachers compile the courses’ exams.
She then wrote that her concern for the course “is an overly negative view of our history and many of our historical figures (if mentioned)” and cited history professors with “impressive credentials” who told her that the AP History curriculum is designed to “downplay our noble history.”
She used slavery to illustrate the point:
As an example, I note our slavery history. Yes, we practiced slavery. But we also ended it voluntarily, at great sacrifice, while the practice continues in many countries still today! Shouldn’t our students be provided that viewpoint? This is part of the argument that America is exceptional. Does our APUSH Framework support or denigrate that position?
Students and teachers outraged over proposed changes to the AP History curriculum have staged protests and walk-outs over the past two weeks in Jefferson County, which lies in the state’s 7th Congressional district. The original proposal called for promoting “patriotism” and downplaying “civil disorder,” although the Jefferson County school board voted Thursday night to adopt a compromise plan.
Elaine Gantz Berman, one of Mazanec’s Democratic colleagues on the state Board of Education, told TPM on Friday that she was “appalled” and “embarrassed” by Mazanec’s remarks.
“I vigorously disagree with her comments,” Berman said. “I’m actually embarrassed that a member of the state Board of Education would represent the ending of slavery the way she chose. It clearly is uninformed, and I’m appalled by her comments.”
TPM’s calls to Mazanec have not yet been returned.
View Mazanac’s Facebook post below:
Image via Sheridan School District No. 2
Many of the people who died ending slavery were draftees, not volunteers in that “voluntary” effort.
Let me read between the lines. Don’t “you people” have enough already???
Also, re: “voluntary” Sure I’ll go along with that. And the civil “war” was just a very realistic re-enactment of what ending slavery MIGHT have looked like if not for the kind voluntary nature of the southern states. Also, the post civil war era civil rights abuses were just a further demonstration of what a non-voluntary racial integration MIGHT HAVE looked like.
This. Lady. Is. A. Moron.
Given the level of “intellectual” thought this board member displays, I’m going full-Godwin immediately:
Yes, we voluntarily ended slavery and the Nazis voluntarily closed the death camps once their supply lines were cut.
Then why did eleven states leave the nation (and start range wars in the new territories), and then fight a pointless and strategically hopeless war, to retain slavery, you fracking imbecile?
Did she say the north is “exceptional:” and the south is just “ordinary”?